Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

D.C.'s September primary likely to be its last

Last Tuesday, the District of Columbia held its 19th September primary election. It may well have been the last.

According to the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (aka MOVE), passed by Congress last year, seven weeks just isn't long enough to certify the primary results, print general-election ballots, send them out to voters abroad and allow the now-requisite 45 days to make the round trip in time for the official count. The Post's Tim Craig detailed the issues at stake in March.

Thus the District -- along with nine states, including Maryland -- are being forced to move their primaries up. This year, the city has gotten special dispensation from the Justice Department to hold the primary as usual, although overseas voters will have seven days longer than regular absentee voters to get their ballots mailed.

Any move would seriously disrupt the biennial rhythms of District politicking -- yard signs sprouting in spring, signature-gathering in June, the Palisades Parade on the Fourth of July, the long grind of block parties and street festivals under the hot August sun.

And, because there appears to be some hesitancy to hold the primary in the summer months, the primary seems likely to be moved back to June. That, in this Democratically dominated town, raises the prospect of six-month lame ducks. In other words, it may become a regular occurrence for mayors and council members to serve one-eighth of their terms after the voters have decided that they no longer want them there.

There's another hazard to good governance: Harry Thomas Jr., the Ward 5 D.C. Council member, points out that elected officials currently take full advantage of the council's two-month summer recess to do their campaigning. With elections in June, council incumbents will have to somehow juggle budget season and reelection campaigns. "It's that much harder," Thomas says. "You won't have your recess time any more."

But Mary Cheh, the D.C. Council member who chairs the committee overseeing elections, says that something must be done. "We're going to have to have a hearing or maybe even a series of hearings about what to do about this," she said. "We have to comply. That's the bottom line."

By Mike DeBonis  | September 21, 2010; 1:33 PM ET
Categories:  DCision 2010, The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: DeMorning DeBonis: Sept. 21, 2010
Next: Gray and Rhee to meet Thursday

Comments

A June primary would be nice

Posted by: DCJUSTICE | September 21, 2010 2:14 PM | Report abuse

What difference does it make, there's no democracy in the District anyway? They will continue to disenfranchise the independent voters like me. Why not skip the primary and just run an open, non-partisan election like they do in many parts of country. What are the DC un-Democratic Party weenies afraid of anyway? Worried their relatives in Maryland won't be able to get into the District to cast their ballots on time like they did in this bogus primary?
Please Congress, retake control of the District.

Posted by: blankspace | September 21, 2010 2:54 PM | Report abuse

what's the downside to june primarys

Posted by: JeroRobson1 | September 21, 2010 7:15 PM | Report abuse

ATTENTION MARY CHEH:
No problem having a June Primary but let's change the participation rules into a very simple system:
For each race, the top two candidates in the open primary, regardless of party or non-party affiliation, proceed to the November elections if one does not receive over 50%. This allows lots of time for the leading candidates to discuss issues.

Posted by: johnklenert | September 22, 2010 7:45 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company