Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Vote-buying charges are the risk of a big-money campaign

There's one question that seems bound to consume the final days of the mayoral campaign: Is Mayor Adrian M. Fenty's campaign buying votes?

That has been the lightly-founded rumor among supporters of D.C. Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray dating back to a Ward 8 straw poll, back in May.

The allegations got a credibility boost last night from WJLA-TV's Sam Ford, who reported on two people who have come forward to say they were promised campaign jobs in exchange for Fenty votes. The jobs were not delivered.

The charges are serious. With people on the record, complete with names and some corroboration for their story, the Fenty campaign is faced with fighting a story that is difficult to disprove. Fenty sources say they have no record of the accusers getting a ride to the polls in a campaign van -- something that they say is thoroughly documented -- and that drivers are given strict instructions on what and what isn't appropriate. But elections officials confirm that at least one accuser did cast a ballot last week.

"We don't operate like that," said Fenty spokesman Sean Madigan. Meanwhile, the Gray camp is leveling accusations that vote-buying is "widespread."

This reporter has seen no evidence that there is any coordinated vote-buying or vote-trading operation inside the campaign, but the allegations illustrate the hazards of a fat campaign war chest in city politics.

The Fenty campaign has become a money-fed machine, feasting on the nearly $5 million in campaign contributions that have been collected for almost two years now. The money has gone to expensive campaign consultants and for high-dollar TV ads, sure, but Fenty has also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on canvassers -- the many, many boots on the ground in city neighborhoods. Without a rabid corps of volunteers to rely on as in 2006, he's had to pay to conduct his massive voter contact campaign, and word of that fact has gotten around: In a city with 10 percent unemployment, Fenty 2010 is hiring.

A campaign that's hiring canvassers or election day staff will be sure to get those workers to the polls, too -- along with a reminder of who exactly is responsible for your recent payday. That's not illegal. But all it takes is one off-message employee or volunteer to cross a line in his recruiting pitch.

And the more you have to hire your campaign workers, the more the expectation becomes that a vote should equal a paycheck. Pretty soon, folks start asking: They got paid, why not me? And maybe one of them who doesn't get a job drops a dime, rings up the local TV station.

It doesn't help that the Fenty GOTV operation has the air of a black-ops mission. Last Saturday, I attempted to interview three voters who were sitting in a Fenty van outside the Greater Southeast Tennis and Learning Center, an early-voting site. I began speaking to one person, munching on a bag lunch, when a driver came and shooed me off. "We're private," she told me.

Last night, I spoke to Fenty campaign organizer Ron Moten, who said he knew 19-year-old Rudolph Williams, one of the accusers. "He's from Sursum Corda; we've helped him out," he said, but he hadn't "come in contact with none of us from the campaign."

Moten says he was in the Fenty campaign office when Ford came in with Williams. "Young dude came up and said, 'I know him, he works for Peaceoholics,' " because everybody knows me. He said, 'I need a job, can you help me get a job?' "

By Mike DeBonis  |  September 9, 2010; 1:41 PM ET
Categories:  Adrian Fenty , DCision 2010 , The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: DeMorning DeBonis: Sept. 9, 2010
Next: Carol Schwartz speaks: Vote for Phil Mendelson

Comments

Mike, if you had seen evidence of vote buying, would Jo Ann Armao have allowed you to report it?

Posted by: joduncan | September 9, 2010 2:08 PM | Report abuse

well, it may be a "risk" for a campaign with a lot of money, but it's more of a risk for a campaign that's seriously desperate.

Posted by: citymom92 | September 9, 2010 2:24 PM | Report abuse

Maybe you could find out if the Fenty campaign has access to contacts of all the voting age youth and home addresses of those who hired through the Summer Jobs Program.
There was no irony in Fenty's telling, during one of the debates, that a survey of the youth had the majority reporting a benefit.

Survey? How done? And NO political access to that contact list? Like, in the last two weeks?

Posted by: incredulous | September 9, 2010 4:09 PM | Report abuse

Sounds like vintage Nickles to me. I can just hear it now: "Your Honor, how can it possibly be said we bought votes when, in fact, none of the kids were actually given the jobs we promised them??"

Posted by: smithhemb | September 9, 2010 4:13 PM | Report abuse

No, I take that question back, because I remember Mayor Fenty expressing pride in expanding the youth jobs program beyond the levels of former mayor Marion Barry's.

It's just the bad stuff about Marion Barry, says Fenty, the unmentionable stuff that should attach to Vincent Gray. Inducing make-work-related obligations to be repaid in the voting booth is the Marion Barry legacy Fenty is proud of. .

Posted by: incredulous | September 9, 2010 4:19 PM | Report abuse

incredulous as much blame as folks put on Barry it's amazing they ignore the same elementary tactics in Fenty.

Fenty is the second coming of Marion Barry.

Posted by: oknow1 | September 9, 2010 6:13 PM | Report abuse

Re the second coming.

True, except that while whites blamed blacks for Barry and DC's corrupt and dysfunctional government, now blacks will be able to blame whites if Fenty's re-elected.

Posted by: smithhemb | September 9, 2010 6:34 PM | Report abuse

It is amazing isn't it? How the mass media looks the other way while Fenty violates just about every law on the books, but every slightly shady thing that Barry does is front page news.

Posted by: tacard1 | September 9, 2010 7:49 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company