Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 5:11 PM ET, 12/20/2010

Peebles' company files countersuit against Nickles, claims defamation

By Mike DeBonis

Megadeveloper R. Donahue Peebles has struck back at outgoing Attorney General Peter J. Nickles, who accused Peebles of committing fraud last month in leasing an Anacostia building to the city government.

On Nov. 10, Nickles filed suit on behalf of the District, claiming that a Peebles-controlled company had improperly charged $1.2 million in expenses back to the city -- including for bar tabs and political contributions -- pursuant to a lease on a building on Martin Luther King Avenue SE.

Now Peebles's company has countersued, saying it was the city that breached the lease "by failing to pay operating expenses that fall squarely within the District's contractual payment obligations" and furthermore broke a settlement agreement it had made with the company, violating principles of "good faith and fair dealing."

The complaint indicates that there was an ongoing dispute over whether the city owed Peebles or vice versa, but after the city real-estate office ordered audits of city leases this year, MLK Associates was singled out for harsh treatment by Nickles -- done "in order to retaliate against [Peebles] for his political activities opposing Mayor Fenty's reelection bid."

Nickles, the countersuit claims, "took an array of improper actions that abused the judicial process, publicly and repeatedly defamed MLK Associates and its partners, and presented MLK Associates in a false light."

For instance: Attorneys for the company met with District representatives, including Real Estate Services Director Robin-Eve Jasper, on Nov. 8. At the meeting, the suit says, Jasper "represented that she had full settlement authority from the District, and the Attorney General's office representatives did not dispute this representation." The District offered to settle the dispute if MLK Associates performed $100,000 worth of improvements to the building.

The owners agreed, but later that day, a top deputy to Nickles informed them there would be no deal. Nickles filed the fraud suit shortly thereafter.

Besides seeking back expense payments, Peebles and company are accusing Nickles of defaming MLK Associates as a "dishonest business that should not be trusted because it has engaged in egregious conduct defrauding the government," and are seeking damages.

Nickles was not immediately available for comment. A court date is set for Feb. 11 -- some five weeks after Nickles leaves the city's employ.

By Mike DeBonis  | December 20, 2010; 5:11 PM ET
Categories:  Adrian Fenty, Don Peebles, The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Ward 7's Yvette Alexander launches fitness challenge
Next: DeMorning DeBonis: Dec. 21, 2010

Comments

Good article. It's a shame Nickles continues to jeopardize the District in every possible way on his way back to Virginia. Glad to see somebody standing up to these extortionists. I hope the judge severely condemns Nickles for his antics, It won't be the first time.

Posted by: TiredOfPropoganda | December 20, 2010 9:06 PM | Report abuse

TiredOfPropaganda,
Get the facts. Do a FOIA request to see how much money Peebles has made off the district government over the years and have whatever authority you trust evaluate the value of what was paid for. Talk about fraud... I wish he had run so this would've all come out.

Posted by: streff | December 21, 2010 1:51 PM | Report abuse

Thanks Don Peebles for standing up to this "Napoleon Complex" man! He will be busy trying to keep his license and Fenty from going to jail in 2011....
Bill

Posted by: BILLJA | December 21, 2010 3:47 PM | Report abuse

Streff,
If there was any ammunition that could possibly be used against Peebles, you really think Nickles and company are holding it back?

As far as I have read, Peebles has one public-private partnership in the District (a lease extended ten years by Fenty) and there is no way in hell that it brings in significant revenue for him compared to his portfolio. Frankly, I think most District residents would be glad to know that Peebles built something on MLK Avenue in Anacostia. Blaming him for doing business with the city is just ridiculous. They are throwing everything at him but the kitchen sink and we all know none of it will stick.

Posted by: TiredOfPropoganda | December 23, 2010 10:47 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company