Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 5:17 PM ET, 02/ 8/2011

Is the D.C. government funding abortions?

By Mike DeBonis

This afternoon, a House Judiciary subcommittee is holding a hearing on H.R. 3, the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortions Act." Not only does the bill restrict federal funding for abortion, it also aims to ban the District from spending its local funds on abortion services.

Only since 2009 has Congress allowed the District government to use its local funds on abortions, as many states do. But has the elimination of the funding restriction actually resulted in government-financed abortions for low-income women?

Yes, it has, but slowly.

Women who are enrolled in the District's health plans for low-income residents under the Medicaid and the D.C. HealthCare Alliance programs currently have coverage for abortion services. The change was effective Aug. 1, 2010, for residents covered under plans run by D.C. Chartered Health, Unison and HSCSN.

Lisa Truitt, interim associate director for managed care at the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance, said that while Medicaid covers a portion of most of the health expenses incurred by the District's poorest residents, abortions are reimbursed fully by the District.

The plan administrators, Truitt said, sent letters to their enrollees last year informing them that abortions were covered. New enrollees, she said, will see abortion included on a provided list of covered services.

But are the women in the plans taking advantage of the services?

A brief survey of abortion providers in the District indicates that not all are billing city-funded plans.

Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington, perhaps the area's best-known abortion provider, will begin accepting District-funded plans for abortions starting Feb. 14, said CEO Laura Meyers.

Planned Parenthood has long accepted District-funded plans for the many non-abortion services that its clinics provide, Meyers said, but low-income women seeking abortions had to pay out of pocket -- perhaps with assistance from charities such as the D.C. Abortion Fund.

But at least one doctor, Nathan Bobrow, has been accepting District-funded plans for abortions for months. Fatima Hinton, clinical office manager for Bobrow, said that women appear to be well aware of their new coverage and that the office has gotten "quite a few calls and made quite a few appointments" for Chartered, Unison or HSCSN enrollees. "They must have good knowledge of it," Hinton said.

Bobrow's office is on the Washington Hospital Center campus. There is also a Women's and Infants' Clinic there, run by the hospital, that occasionally performs abortions, mostly related to fetal genetic issues. WHC accepts the Chartered and Unison plans, a hospital spokesman said.

Truitt said that the city has been processing billings for abortions, but she was not immediately able to say how many.

Meyers of Planned Parenthood expressed concern at the House proposal to end local funding, saying it might cause pregnant low-income women to delay treatment with "devastating" effects. And she was not shy about expressing a political argument against the move: "This is an attack on home rule for the District of Columbia," Meyers said, calling it part of a "disturbing trend" of congressional intervention.

By Mike DeBonis  | February 8, 2011; 5:17 PM ET
Categories:  The District  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Gray moves to oust United Medical Center board members, supports sale
Next: DeMorning DeBonis: Feb. 9, 2011


I have a thirteen year old girl, and honest to god every day I wake up I am thankful that I have an incredible insurance policy that pays for my medical insurance. I found insurance from Wise Health Insurance website and it doesn’t pay 100% on everything, but when I receive the bill and find out just how much I would have had to pay had I not been insured I realize that there is no way in the world that I could have afforded kind of care without it.

Posted by: martyqick | February 9, 2011 4:18 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company