Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Google, China and espionage

The world's attention is appropriately centered on the immense tragedy in Haiti, but the story about Google's battle with China over cyber espionage has drawn a huge internet audience and a strong comment stream from a different crowd of readers.

Some readers cheer Google for its threat to shut down its Chinese web operations because of cyberattacks and censorship originating in China. There are scoffers who say that Google has cooperated with U.S. intelligence authorities to spy on its own citizens. There are those who think China is too a big a market for Google to ignore, no matter the costs, and there are the advice givers with several suggestions on how to solve the problem.

As Ariana Eunjung Cha and Ellen Nakashima write, "Security experts say the attacks showed a new level of sophistication, exploiting multiple flaws in different software programs and underscoring what senior administration officials have said over the past year is an increasingly serious cyber threat to the nation's critical industries."

We'll start with dsrobins, who wrote, "Google should pull out of China and the sooner the better. Google shamed itself when it first went in and cravenly submitted to the internet access provisions the Chinese dictatorship demanded. It has now helped suppress many protests of Chinese people seeking freedom all across the nation, most shamefully so the Uighurs and Tibetans. Companies that supported corrupt dictatorships like Hitler and Mussolini were punished and it should be no diffent with Google today."

But mugengsr1 said, "Google needs China. China DOES NOT need Google. Google wants to dominate the world, and 1/3 of the world lives in China. Bottomline. Google's threats are hollow."

democratus wrote, "I work in Network security and I can tell you that the majority of worldwide hack attempts emanate from the Asian side of the world. It is a daily, no hourly, occurrence. If you start blocking one IP range others pop up. There is a thread that goes through China around this type of activity and it is closely related to their R&D (Receive and Duplicate)."

shahjahanbhatti1 said, "Google users worldwide appreciate Google administrators for blowing the whistle. Internet facility is not compatible with communism where everything is owned by the party."

CrtiticalMass wrote, "China is a mercantilist state that does not intend to conduct business within established norms of conduct. No respect whatever for intellectual property, no compunction against outright theft, no laws restricting foreign bribes, nada. the country is basically a bandit that manipulates its currency and does these other things so they can rob other countries. Time to cut them off."

Intuition1010 said, "First, everyone using Google knows they keep track of searches. If they don't then they have not read any of the user service agreements or Articles regarding Google. Google has always been upfront with that information. There is quite a difference between monitoring what users are Googling and SPYING/HACKING into private accounts....especially accounts owned by other countries! I think they call it espionage.........!"

rapp_mitch asked, "Can someone explain to me what Google being in China has to do with the attacks and how pulling out of China will prevent future attacks? Can't China just attack the Google servers in the US?"

debv8604 wrote, "Business is business. Consumers can make a difference in who succeeds. Google should pull out of China because maybe, just maybe, consumers will stay away from Google. Of course, those consumers would really have to care about China's disregard for quality products, products that do not harm and those pesky privacy and IP laws."

sgr_astar said, "There is no problem for google to track down that the hack attack came from the Chinese authority. As a result, they should have enough ground to take the authority to the court. Failing to do so is not going to teach the Chinese web police a lesson. It is also worth noting that the Chinese market is not free, and should not be allowed in WTO in the first place."

TopnotchInChina advised that "...Google is currently inviting a tiger for diner at its table. If Google is not careful, the tiger will eat its food on its plate, Googles food and then Google! The only way to stay on top for Google is to separate completely World versus China. Run Google China the same way as they are running Baidu and the others. Become a Tiger attacking other Tiger"

But steveandjanereed1 wrote, "It doesn't matter. The Chinese people will demand for themselves unfettered access eventually. No matter how high the brittle walls of ego built by the Chinese leadership culture. On the other hand, it could be argued that the leadership is just managing a soft landing trying to avoid major social upheaval in a country undergoing such vast changes. I wouldn't argue that however."

GMinChina said, "...By the way, The U.S. government, with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T, has engaged in a massive program of illegal dragnet surveillance of domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001... Is Google going to make a statement with Uncle Sam and quit US market?"

Rudy7 wrote, "Guess what? Corporate and government espionage and the muzzling some forms of free speech -- including by Western governments and privately-owned media companies -- is a worldwide fact of life. No doubt Google itself has been involved in such activities as a means of expanding its business. So what is the big deal unless everybody quits doing it?"

juggernautenterprises said, "I applaud Google for not rolling over while crying, 'Why won't somebody do something about their behavior.'... Notice also that they didn't pull out. They've knowingly put themselves in a position to be thrown out by refusing continued censorship. They also didn't directly accuse the government. By constructing this framework, Goggle is showing great negotiating skill."

wts11 wrote, "Is is another case of American's meddling in Chinese affairs. This is totally politically motivated with the cover of cypersecurity/cyperspying... At the same time, you enlist the help of the cop in the world to intimidate your neighbor through newspaper stories in WaPo, NYT and like. All this is a conspiracy but to undermine your neighbor. I'd say, get out and get lost if I were your neighbor."

MILWI said, "Take a stand, make a statement, Google. Get out of China. That country is run by a bunch of nasties."

We'll close with one of those exchanges that demonstrates the self-correcting nature of internet comment streams:

joeblow8 wrote, "Chinese are a lower form of life."

And drifter1999_99 replied immediately, "joeblow8, what kind of trash are you!"

All comments on this article are here.

By Doug Feaver  |  January 14, 2010; 7:35 AM ET
 | Tags: China, Espionage, Google, Search  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Republicans gain on Kennedy's Senate seat
Next: Kennedy's Senate seat and health care reform

Comments

While Democrats continue to max out U.S. Credit through relentless deficit spending, have they discounted China, U.S. Government's biggest creditor? China could cripple U.S. military defense budgets by demanding full payment of U.S. debts. The Communist Government has effectively usurped U.S. global power, by allowing Congress to repeatedly approve huge borrowing from China. A default by U.S. Government on China’s loans could destroy U.S. credit ratings and the dollar globally, particularly with oil producing nations that still accept U.S. Dollars. Outrageously Americans will be held hostage by China, having to pay U.S. Government higher and higher taxes to pay interests and principal on Chinese loans, shrinking U.S. Citizens’ discretionary income needed to buy American goods and services, causing more U.S. unemployment.

Posted by: RossWolf1 | January 17, 2010 3:59 PM | Report abuse

Google commonly censors search results to comply with Digital Millennium Copyright Act-related legal complaints.[2]

In 2002 Google was found to have censored websites that provided information critical of Scientology, in compliance with the United States' DMCA legislation.[3][4] Google replaced the banned results with links to the DMCA complaint that caused the site to be removed. The DMCA complaint contains the site to be removed, and the organizations that requested the removal. The publicity stemming from this incident was the impetus for Google's making public of the DMCA notices on the Chilling Effects archive, which archives legal threats of all sorts made against Internet users and Internet sites.[5] [edit] United Kingdom

On 21 September 2006,[6] it was reported that Google had 'delisted' Inquisition 21st Century, a website which claims to challenge moral authoritarian and sexually absolutist ideas in the United Kingdom. According to Inquisition 21 themselves, Google was acting "in support of a campaign by law enforcement agencies in the US and UK to suppress emerging information about their involvement in major malpractice", allegedly exposed by their own investigation of and legal action against those who carried out Operation Ore, a groundbreaking, far reaching and much criticized law enforcement campaign against the viewers of child pornography.[7] Google released a press statement suggesting Inquisition 21 had attempted to manipulate search results.[6]
[edit] Germany and France

On October 22, 2002, a study reported that approximately 113 Internet sites had been removed from the German and French versions of Google.[8] This censorship mainly affected White Nationalist, Nazi, anti-semitic, radical Islamic websites and at least one fundamentalist Christian[9] website, which is adamantly opposed to racism and anti-semitism[10]. Under French and German law, hate speech and Holocaust denial are illegal. In the case of Germany, violent or sex-related sites such as YouPorn and BME that the Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien deems harmful to youth are also censored. Google complies with these laws by not including sites containing such material in its search results. However, Google lists the number of excluded results at the bottom of the result list and links to Chilling Effects for an explanation.[1]

Elliott Madison used Twitter to direct protesters of G20 convention in 2009 was arrested and jailed for hindering police. Breaking US law will go to jail, how about Chinese law? Mark A Hall was arrested and jailed for making up a song to vent his frustration at redeployment to Iraq. He was deemed a threat to security. How about those who use words for trying to topple the Chinese government? Weren't they a threat to the Chinese?

Posted by: PeterT2 | January 15, 2010 9:06 PM | Report abuse

People are actually falling for Google’s jibberjabber? When did it become the torchbearer for human rights? Last time I checked, they are a for-profit corporation.

This is the logic that bothers me: Google say they are the victim of organized cyber-attacks from China. They say they have thwarted the attacks, and have since decided to open up an uncensored search engine in China as a response. I’m sorry, but A does not lead to B here. If your systems are being hacked, add more security. What’s running a uncensored search engine going to do?

There is this wonderful modern technology called the Internet, where you can connect to any computer from any other computer on Earth. Let’s say Google totally pulls out from China, does this prevent Chinese hackers from infiltrating Google servers? You know the answer, and so does Google.

The way I see it, this is a desperate attempt of a profit-driven corporation to get some PR (both outside and inside China) and a way to compete against home-grown Chinese Internet companies (certainly people would use uncensored over censored search engine). Google has never established a foothold in China, and this is there attempt to get there.

Posted by: dumpforjunk | January 15, 2010 11:39 AM | Report abuse

From a capitalist point of view Google does need China. From a realist point of view China will destroy Google if Google remains in China. China Inc. is nothing more than an imperial and racist state. China's goal has not changed in more than 2,000 years - world domination. In search of ever greater profit our industrialists have sold the US out. The transfer of technology will eventually be seen as the cause of the destruction of the US. Better that Google leaves China.

Posted by: Freethotlib | January 14, 2010 11:19 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company