Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts

Airlines canceling more flights

By Associated Press and Staff Reports

U.S. airlines canceled 4,754 flights in September, an increase from 2,934 in the same month a year ago, after the government required airlines to let passengers off stuck flights within three hours.

The cancellation rate, which was 0.9 percent in September, compared with 0.57 percent in September 2009, has increased in four of the five months since the U.S. Transportation Department imposed a rule April 29 to discourage airlines from keeping passengers on delayed aircraft.

DOT reported that the number of flights with tarmac delays of more than three hours dropped to four in September, compared to six in September 2009. Officials said in a statement that the only tarmac delays of longer than three hours were due to weather in New York and Philadelphia on Sept. 22.

According to DOT, there were 12 tarmac delays of three hours or more reported from May through September, compared to 535 during the same period in 2009. Under the new rules, airlines face fines up to $27,500 per passenger for tarmac delays of more than three hours.

Have you been stuck on the tarmac recently or had to deal with a canceled flight? Post a comment below.

By Associated Press and Staff Reports  | November 9, 2010; 11:16 AM ET
Categories:  Airports, Aviation  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: NTSB holds forum on aging drivers
Next: No VRE service on Thursday

Comments

It would be great to have a consumer advocate colmnum to advise travlers about what their options are should their flights be canceled or delayed. It would be good to see a head to head comparison of the airlines responses and user friendliness( or not!) towards passangers who have delayed and cancelled flights.

Posted by: soccerhead | November 9, 2010 12:33 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company