Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts

N.J. gets bill for scrapped tunnel

By The Associated Press and Staff Reports

NJ Transit owes the federal government $271 million for the Hudson River rail tunnel that Gov. Chris Christie scrapped last month.

The Federal Transit Administration on Monday sent the railroad the bill, saying interest and penalty charges will be added.

The Record newspaper reported the FTA also said it would launch a "complete audit" of the project to determine how much federal funds still have not been spent.

The $8.7 billion project to construct a rail tunnel between New Jersey and New York was 15 years in the making when Christie pulled the plug, citing cost overruns. The state's share of the project was estimated at more than $2.7 billion. The federal government and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey were each contributing $3 billion.

Officials aren't saying where NJ Transit will get the money to pay the bill.

An Amtrak official told the Asbury Park Press earlier this week that the passenger rail system has been discussing a deal with New Jersey Transit to work on the tunnel connecting New Jersey and New York City. Amtrak Vice President Al Engel said the agency is looking into using the tunnel for high-speed rail.

The Northeast Corridor has grown increasingly congested for train traffic, and Amtrak has been studying whether there was a need for yet another tunnel between New Jersey and New York City -- in addition to the project that Christie stopped. Rail ridership between Washington and Boston is expected to double by 2030, Amtrak has said.

By The Associated Press and Staff Reports  | November 9, 2010; 10:22 AM ET
Categories:  Transportation News  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Traffic safety campaign kicks off
Next: NTSB holds forum on aging drivers

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company