Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts
Posted at 2:20 PM ET, 12/ 3/2010

DOT proposes rear-visibility rules

By Associated Press and Staff Reports

Rear-view cameras could become more common in future cars and trucks under rules proposed by the government Friday to address concerns about drivers unintentionally backing over children.

The new requirements from the Transportation Department are intended to improve rear visibility in cars by the 2014 model year. Most carmakers would comply by installing rear-mounted video cameras and in-vehicle displays. The government estimated that video systems would add about $200 to the cost of each new vehicle.

Congress in 2008 set in motion the safety upgrades in response to dozens of accidents in which children were backed over. At issue in particular were blind zones in large sport utility vehicles and pickups.

"There is no more tragic accident than for a parent or caregiver to back out of a garage or driveway and kill or injure an undetected child playing behind the vehicle," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. He said the changes would "help drivers see into those blind zones directly behind vehicles to make sure it is safe to back up."

Nearly 300 people are killed and 18,000 injured each year because of backovers, according to data kept by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Many happen in driveways and parking lots. Nearly half the deaths involve children under age 5, and the crashes also affect the elderly.

The agency estimated that the requirements could save 95 to 112 lives every year and prevent more than 7,000 injuries annually.

In about 70 percent of the cases, a family member is responsible for the death, said Janette Fennell, president of Kids and Cars, a Kansas-based safety group.

Automakers have added video cameras and object detection sensors to vehicles to help drivers when backing up or parking. Backup cameras are optional equipment on most vehicles; only about 20 percent of 2010 vehicles have the cameras onboard.

Automakers said they were reviewing the proposal but were supportive of efforts to keep children safe. Ford announced that rear-view cameras would be available on most Ford and Lincoln models by the end of 2011.

The proposal is expected to be completed next year after a 60-day public comment period.

Under the plan, 10 percent of the vehicle fleet will need to meet the standards by the 2012 model year, followed by 40 percent in 2013 and all new vehicles by 2014. The rules will apply to all passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, minivans and other vehicles weighing up to 10,000 pounds. Under the plan, test objects would need to be visible in an area 20 feet behind the vehicle and about 5 feet to either side of the vehicle's center.

The government estimated the new requirements would cost about $1.9 billion to $2.7 billion.

By Associated Press and Staff Reports  | December 3, 2010; 2:20 PM ET
Categories:  Transportation News  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Alexandria closures for Christmas walk
Next: VRE train without lights, heat

Comments

Car loan companies must love all the rules and regulations we have to make cars more unaffordable.

Posted by: getjiggly1 | December 3, 2010 4:55 PM | Report abuse

Whether we like it or not, economists can, and do, calculate how much safety programs cost per life saved. This gives us a sense of proportion. If cost were no object, airplanes would be equipped with compartments that detach whenever planes fail and water would be treated with ultraviolet radiation instead of chlorine.

Good programs are cheap. Requiring seatbelts in cars, for example, costs consumers about $30,000 per life saved. Chlorinated water is better still, despite the increased cause of cancer.

So, how do rear view cameras stack up? According to gov't studies, this proposal will cost ~ $2.3 billion and save ~ 100 lives per year. That is, consumers will shell out $23 million per life saved which, as it turns out, is about on par with airbags.

Wouldn't it be cheaper just to tell children not to play in the driveway?

Posted by: Senjata | December 5, 2010 1:11 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company