Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts
Posted at 2:09 PM ET, 12/ 1/2010

Rush hour ridership and Union Station

By Luke Rosiak

A new blog from Metro's Office of Long-Range Planning has several interesting visualizations of system usage.

This simulation of the Union Station mezzanine models what is all too familiar to riders entering that station: A convergence of MARC, Amtrak and VRE train riders mixing with other Metro passengers in a narrow hallway before bottlenecking at the narrow escalators. (That many of the escalators there have been chronically out of service was not taken into account.) That station will soon be undergoing alterations.

The below image shows rush hour ridership with directions, where a thicker line means more riders.

It shows relatively sparse Green Line ridership outside of downtown, and a much higher burden on the western leg of the Red Line than the eastern one. The stretch of the Blue Line past Arlington Cemetery, too, brings 3,000 to 6,000 riders towards downtown, and less than 3,000 towards the Pentagon. There has been talk of rerouting some Blue Line trains to address that pattern.

By Luke Rosiak  | December 1, 2010; 2:09 PM ET
Categories:  Metro  | Tags:  Online tools  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Problems on Georgia Ave.
Next: Free Metro option for MARC riders

Comments

Missing from that simulation are the tour groups milling around trying to get organized and the frustrated people at the fare machines who can't get their Smart Benefits to load properly.

Posted by: WashingtonDame | December 1, 2010 3:31 PM | Report abuse

WTF? Is Metro conducting surveillance of itself for terrorists? They don't even have to go to a station anymore, just logon to the internet and we'll paint targets all over ourselves. Wow.

Posted by: getjiggly1 | December 1, 2010 3:41 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company