Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts
Posted at 3:02 PM ET, 02/ 7/2011

Amtrak proposes $13.5-billion project

By Washington Post Wire and Staff Reports

Amtrak is proposing a $13.5-billion project that will include building two commuter rail tunnels from New Jersey to New York by 2020, replacing a $9.7 billion project that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) killed.

The so-called Gateway project would allow New Jersey Transit and Amtrak to increase commuter rail capacity 65 percent by adding 13 and eight trains per hour, respectively, at peak times into New York, according to a statement today from N. J. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D).

The Gateway tunnels would connect to an expanded Penn Station in New York with seven additional tracks, increasing intercity and high-speed rail access in the Northeast Corridor. Amtrak's plan also calls for replacing a 100-year-old bridge and doubling the number of tracks between Newark, New Jersey, and Penn Station.

Amtrak spokesman Steve Kulm called the project "a necessary part of Amtrak's vision for bringing high-speed rail to the Northeast Corridor." More than two out of every three travelers through the region passes through New York, he said.

Penn Station, used by more than 550,000 people a day, is operating at capacity and demand is expected to double in the next 20 years, according to Amtrak.

Amtrak would spend $50 million on preliminary engineering and design work and take the lead in finding other funding sources, according to the statement. Possible contributors include the states of New York and New Jersey; New York City; New Jersey Transit, New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, as well as private investors, it said.

The proposal comes months after Christie killed plans for a new tunnel to relieve travel congestion. He cited concerns about New Jersey being on the hook for any cost overruns.
The tunnel under the Hudson River would have doubled rail capacity between New Jersey and New York at a time when train service between the states is at capacity and delays are frequent.

By Washington Post Wire and Staff Reports  | February 7, 2011; 3:02 PM ET
Categories:  Amtrak  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: ICC toll road to open Feb. 22
Next: Power outage delays Newark flights


Chris Christie: Eff off!

Posted by: bs2004 | February 7, 2011 4:11 PM | Report abuse

Sanity restored. Thankfully the generations that preceeded us had the same foresight, or we'd be a 2nd rate country today.

Posted by: jackstrawdc1 | February 7, 2011 4:13 PM | Report abuse

Is this the SAME New York City which is cutting schools and teachers because they are short $2billion? How are they going to pay for this expense? Or do they expect OTHERS to pay for it instead?

Posted by: RSweeney1 | February 7, 2011 5:14 PM | Report abuse

Oh how very interesting! When Christie first cancelled the tunnel because of the burden it was putting on the shoulders of NJ Taxpayers & the fact that it was going to dead end 150 ft below Macy's basement, LaHood, Lautenberg & Menendez all criticized Christie. Telling everyone this was the best that could be done & it wasn't possible to make any changes. Now the tunnel will be connecting to Amtrak and Penn Station, the cost doesn't fall solely on the NJ taxpayer and somehow the monies were miraculously found. Thanks Governor Christie for sticking to your guns. As far as for our Senator's why did you perpetrate the sham instead of doing this from the beginning?

Posted by: jerzygurl135 | February 7, 2011 5:55 PM | Report abuse

Okay, so the $9.7 billion dollar project is too expensive. What to do? I know! Replace it with a $13.5 billion dollar project.

This is what we call sanity.

Posted by: slar | February 8, 2011 8:47 PM | Report abuse

No, slar, it's stimulus!

Why stop there? Let's head for $20 billion, what could be wrong with that?

Posted by: getjiggly1 | February 9, 2011 10:12 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company