Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Transportation Home  |  Discussions  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |      Twitter |    Facebook   |  phone Alerts
Posted at 3:53 PM ET, 03/ 9/2011

Md. Sen.: Repeal ethanol tax credit

By Luke Rosiak

A bill introduced Wednesday by senators Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) would kill a 45-cent per gallon tax credit to blenders of ethanol--generally, oil companies--in a move that could recover $6 billion for federal coffers. A Government Accountability Office report describing the tax credit as "largely unneeded today to ensure demand for domestic ethanol production."

"Cutting yet another subsidy to big oil that is making big profits is smart policy. Rather than underwriting ethanol subsidies that are causing food prices to skyrocket, we should be supporting American innovation in more sustainable alternative fuels the results of which will help create jobs, lower energy costs and strengthen our national security," Cardin said in a statement.

Policies enacted under the George W. Bush administration required extensive use of ethanol before advanced forms, including cellulosic, were viable. The result was a market-distorting subsidy, researchers and critics say, for inefficient corn-based ethanol and a shortage of corn that drove up food prices.

"President Bush had championed a forward-looking ethanol mandate that required levels that will become feasible only once advanced cellulosic ethanol hits the market. So far, efforts to meet the mandate have come almost entirely from corn. Largely as a result, corn prices have tripled, and the economic calculations on which corn-based ethanol plans were predicated no longer apply," I reported in 2008.

"The ethanol tax credit is bad economic policy, bad energy policy and bad environmental policy. The $6 billion we waste every year on corporate welfare should instead stay in taxpayers' pockets where it can be used to spur innovation, stimulate growth and create jobs," Coburn said, according to a statement.

"While there are a wide range of federal incentives available for ethanol production, the [Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit] essentially provides free money for blenders who are already mandated by the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) to blend ethanol in fuel," a statement from Coburn's office said.

By Luke Rosiak  | March 9, 2011; 3:53 PM ET
Categories:  Maryland, Transportation Politics  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Winter biking winners announced
Next: D.C. giving away sandbags

Comments

Tom Coburn is from Maryland?

Posted by: getjiggly1 | March 9, 2011 5:09 PM | Report abuse

Pew, does something stink?

510-537-1796

Posted by: cappcharlie | March 9, 2011 5:45 PM | Report abuse

No, Coburn is not from Maryland.....even the voters of western maryland are not that crazy!

Posted by: OldSalt8 | March 9, 2011 9:06 PM | Report abuse

It's about time.

Posted by: slar | March 9, 2011 11:04 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company