Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Bryant Gumbel offers his solution for making the NFL safer

sicover.jpgIn the ongoing debate about how to make the NFL safer, solutions including a return to leather helmets have been offered.

Bryant Gumbel, in his commentary on HBO's "Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel," offers another idea this week -- one that Redskins fans may have heard before.

The solution also happens to be one that might result in more players looking like Ray Nitschke, but that doesn't seem like such a bad thing.

Finally tonight, a few words about head impact collisions. For the past ten days or so, the NFL's stated desire to eliminate helmet hits has been the talk of the sports world. Some have cried foul, others have said such hits are part of the game, and still others have claimed they're unavoidable. Well, they're not.
There is, instead, a very simple way to eliminate such hits and all but guarantee total player cooperation. All the league would have to do is ban the facemask. Don't laugh - the game was played without facemasks of any kind until the early 1950's, and they've only been mandatory for a little more than three decades.
Absent the protection a facemask affords, it's illogical to think that any player, no matter how aggressive, would try to lead with his head. Because while it's the helmet that does the damage - it's the facemask that emboldens the player. Would eliminating the facemask lead to a lot of broken noses? Absolutely. Would players routinely be getting stitches and split lips? No doubt. But better that guys lose a few teeth than their memories of ever playing the game at all.
Is a facemask ban realistic? I don't know. I guess that depends on just how serious NFL honchos are about getting rid of helmet hits and reducing concussions. If they're serious then they could view this as a serious option, as one of their own once did. George Preston Marshall, the former owner of the Washington Redskins, actually suggested banning the facemask in the NFL because he said it would lead to more serious injuries than it was designed to prevent. That was back in 1955. It was a good idea then... it might be an even better one now. "

By Cindy Boren  | October 28, 2010; 10:45 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Miami Heat increases security after turning up star power with LeBron James
Next: Duke easily takes top spot in AP's preseason men's basketball poll

Comments

No, Bryant the best way to keep us safe is to keep you from ever doing play by play in a game, again. Please don't do that it hurts our ears. OK, it may not help those on the field but you can understand my concern, right!

Posted by: Berndaddy | October 28, 2010 11:52 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company