Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 11:00 AM ET, 01/ 3/2011

Roger Goodell sends letter to 5 million NFL fans

By Cindy Boren

On the day after the regular season ended, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell emailed about 5 million fans, expressing the league's stance on the rookie wage scale, the 18-game season, the health of players and the continuing impact of a sluggish economy on the game.

Here's the text of the letter, in full:

With one of the most exciting regular seasons now completed and the playoffs about to begin, let me first thank you and all NFL fans for your incredible support. Many fans have been asking me where we stand on signing a new collective bargaining agreement with the player's union. Let me update you and be clear at the outset:
I know we can and will reach an agreement.
My goal as Commissioner now is to help our teams and players find a solution that is fair to everyone and ensures that football becomes more popular, accessible, and fun. We want the next decade to be the best yet for our fans, and I'm ready to work day and night to make that happen.
We've come a long way. Compare where we are today with 10 years ago. From player accountability to player safety, more and better television coverage, upgrading the in-stadium experience, innovations like the RedZone channel, the Draft in prime time and playing the Pro Bowl before the Super Bowl, we are focused on doing what's best for the players, teams, and fans. My priority is and always will be the game and the fans who love our game.
The NFL is great because fans care deeply about it. Economic conditions, however, have changed dramatically inside and outside the NFL since 2006 when we negotiated the last CBA. A 10 percent unemployment rate hurts us all. Fans have limited budgets and rightly want the most for their money. I get it.
Yes, NFL players deserve to be paid well. Unfortunately, economic realities are forcing everyone to make tough choices and the NFL is no different. These are not easy negotiations, but the outcome can be positive. If both sides give a little, everyone, including fans, will get a lot and the game will improve through innovation.
Even in difficult economic times, a new CBA presents us with the opportunity to secure the future of our game. You may ask how will the NFL look under this vision?
A significant change would be to resolve fan complaints about preseason by modifying our 20-game format. Fans tell us they don't like the quality of the preseason games, and we're listening. An enhanced season of 18 regular season and two preseason games would not add a single game for the players collectively, but would give fans more meaningful, high-quality football.
Our emphasis on player health and safety is absolutely essential to the future of our game. We are strictly enforcing rules that protect players from unnecessarily dangerous play, especially involving hits to the head. We are changing the "play through it" culture to a "player-first" culture to ensure that if a player has a head injury, he doesn't play again until his health is certain. We are also addressing the potential wear-and-tear on players in the way they train in-season and off-season.
It's not just the health of players that concerns us. We must ensure the health of the league. That includes a new system that properly compensates proven veterans and retired players by shifting some of the outrageous sums paid to many unproven rookies. Earlier this year, Sports Illustrated published a list of the 50 highest-paid American athletes that included five 2009 NFL rookies. Every other athlete on the list was a proven veteran. In 2009, NFL clubs contracted $1.2 billion to 256 drafted rookies with $585 million guaranteed before they had stepped on an NFL field.
Don't get me wrong: top draft choices will continue to be highly paid. All we're asking for is a return to common sense in paying our rookies. Other leagues have done this and we can too.
These improvements and more will lead to better football, plain and simple. A forward looking CBA that is fair to players and clubs will lead to a great future for the NFL and our fans.
My job is to represent the game - the fans, teams, players, coaches and business partners. Protecting the integrity of the game and ensuring it thrives is a responsibility I take very seriously.
This is about more than a labor agreement. It's about the future of the NFL. We have to improve and will be relentless in our quest. The commitment to our fans is to make the NFL experience even better in the years ahead. With a responsible CBA, we will fulfill that vision.
Happy New Year and enjoy the playoffs.
Roger Goodell

By Cindy Boren  | January 3, 2011; 11:00 AM ET
Categories:  NFL  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Charlie Weis makes jump from Chiefs to Florida
Next: Dave Wannstedt won't coach Pitt in Compass Bowl

Comments

A 7-9 team winning it's division and making the playoffs isn't my idea of "high quality" football.

Posted by: epwolff | January 3, 2011 12:00 PM | Report abuse

"A 7-9 team winning it's division and making the playoffs isn't my idea of "high quality" football."

Posted by: epwolff | January 3, 2011 12:00 PM

Agreed, but I don't see a viable alternative. If you're going to have divisional play, there has to be a reward for winning the division. The most logical, and meaningful, reward is making the playoffs. Inevitably, there are occasionally going to be years when most, or even all, of the teams in the division are going to struggle, as happened in the NFC West this season.

Nevertheless, to my way of thinking, the division winners have to make the playoffs, even teams with losing records like this year's Seahawks. If there's no meaningful reward for winning the division, why have them? I would support, however, seeding the playoff teams and determining home field advantage based on record, not on status as a division winner. Rewarding Seattle with a home playoff game just for winning the putrid NFC West doesn't make any sense.

Posted by: rufus_t_firefly | January 3, 2011 12:38 PM | Report abuse

I find it sad that the solution to "fans don't like preseason games", an issue that only occurs each August, is to extend the season and possibly turn the playoffs into an even more crapshoot based on who has made it 2 extra more games healthy.

Posted by: BrokenClipboard | January 3, 2011 1:18 PM | Report abuse

I agree with both Wolff and Rufus, but look at the flipside - the Raiders, who went 6-0 in their division....and didn't make the playoffs. First time that's ever happened, too.

Posted by: RPrecupjr | January 3, 2011 1:34 PM | Report abuse

I find it sad that the solution to "fans don't like preseason games", an issue that only occurs each August, is to extend the season and possibly turn the playoffs into an even more crapshoot based on who has made it 2 extra more games healthy.

Posted by: BrokenClipboard | January 3, 2011 1:18 PM | Report abuse
--------------------------------------------
You state your dissatisfaction with the solution but offer no alternative. The fact is, the 2 extra games would be played in August so the season would not run longer and why do you object to 2 more games? If a team plays poorly in the beginning but starts to play better at the end of the season, so be it. i can see no reason not to play the 2 more games but I think rosters would have to be expanded as there will be more injuries.

Posted by: chopin224 | January 3, 2011 2:06 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company