Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 8:00 AM ET, 03/10/2011

Rutgers goes home as St. John's gets the (non) calls

By Cindy Boren

Let's review the unreviewable: Justin Brownlee traveled. He stepped out of bounds. He heaved the ball into the stands. He didn't get whistled for either of the first two offenses and didn't draw a technical for the third.

It was a terrible, awful, rotten way for St. John's to end Rutgers' season with a 65-63 victory in the Big East Conference tournament in Madison Square Garden. It was so awful that even the conference commissioner was contrite.

"The Big East Conference acknowledges that two separate officiating errors occurred at the conclusion of the St. John's vs. Rutgers game," Commissioner John Marinatto said of the performance by referees Jim Burr, Tim Higgins and Carl Walton in a statement issued by the Big East. "Both missed violations should have caused the game clock to stop and a change of possession to occur prior to the end of the game. Neither error is reviewable or correctable under NCAA playing rules."

See? It stinks. "That was a poor job and it's okay for us to say it," Jay Bilas said on "Mike and Mike in the Morning." Maybe change will be forthcoming, but it doesn't help Rutgers, which finishes 15-17. "I saw it on YouTube," Rutgers Coach Mike Rice said, personifying the high road. "There was a mistake. They will admit it. I made several mistakes, my players made several mistakes, I'm sure that my staff who thinks they're always right made several mistakes."

So St. John's, a New York City team, gets one in the Garden and advances and maybe, Ian O'Connor writes, feels like a Final Four team.

Good teams get better breaks. Charmed teams weather bad bounces and maneuver their way around the officials' human flaws to make deep runs in the NCAA tournament.
St. John's has declared itself one of those teams. St. John's is strong enough, and opportunistic enough, to reach the Final Four for the first time since 1985, a notion Dwight Hardy embraced on his postgame walk to the winning locker room.
"I think we have a great shot of making it to the Final Four," Hardy told ESPNNewYork.com. "If we can just play our style and get teams to play the way we want to play, we can beat anybody. We showed it here by beating Duke."

Maybe so. But that ending still stinks.

By Cindy Boren  | March 10, 2011; 8:00 AM ET
Categories:  College basketball  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Atlanta Braves' minor-league manager injured by line drive, airlifted to hospital
Next: Brandon Davies will be on BYU bench during Mountain West tournament

Comments

Whatever the refs are paid by the schools/NCAA is nothing compared to what sports books pay them for the preferred outcome. The 'officiating' of this game made that crystal clear. It's known that pro refs are paid to influence outcomes by bookies (Tim Donaghy anyone?)and it is also evident that this is done at the college level as well. Any sane human who sees how this game was called at the end can come to no other conclusion.

Posted by: splitbill | March 10, 2011 11:51 AM | Report abuse

Splitbill, you don't know what your talking about. Rutgers covered the spread. If you bet on Rutgers you won. So were the refs being paid to ensure a Rutgers Victory?

Posted by: macdogbill | March 10, 2011 5:11 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company