Dissecting the Republican Health Care Plan (Part 1)
The word of the day is "convergence." That -- and that alone -- is the definitive message of the conservative health reform alternative developed by Sens. Tom Coburn (Okla.) and Richard Burr (N.C.), as well as Rep. Paul Ryan (Wisc.). For now, some of the key provisions are about as clear as mud. The plan's changes to the tax code, in particular, are impossible to discern. So I'll do another post when I can get some clarity on those issues. The politics, however, are perfectly straightforward.
A superficial read of the Patients' Choice Act -- which I've uploaded here -- would make you think you're digging into a liberal bill. A fair chunk of the rhetoric is lifted straight from Sen. Ted Kennedy's office. "It is time to publicly admit that the health care system in America is broken," begins the document. "Health care is not a commodity in the traditional sense," it continues. "States should provide direct oversight of health insurers to make sure they are playing by fair rules," it demands. The way we pay private insurers in Medicare "wastes taxpayer dollars and lines the pockets of insurance executives," it says. Elsewhere, it praises solutions that have worked in several European countries."
And though it's still too early to say how the policy fits together, it's clear that many traditionally Democratic concepts have been embraced. To put it simply, the plan wants to encourage a version of the Massachusetts reforms -- which it calls a "well-known, bi-partisan achievement of universal health care" -- in every state. There are some differences, of course. The plan doesn't have an individual mandate. It doesn't have an obvious tax on employers. But it strongly endorses State Health Insurance Exchanges. And that, for Republicans, is a radical change in policy.
This idea -- present in every Democratic proposal but absent in Arizona Sen.John McCain's plan -- would empower states to create heavily regulated marketplaces of insurers. The plans offered would have to "meet the same statutory standard used for the health benefits given to Members of Congress." Cherrypicking would be discouraged through risk adjustment, which the PCA calls "a model that works in several European countries." The government would automatically enroll individuals in plans whenever they interacted with a government agency and states would be able to join into regional cooperatives to increase the size of their risk pool.
In essence, Coburn, Burr, and Ryan are abandoning the individual market entirely. Like Democrats, they're arguing that individuals cannot successfully navigate the insurance market, and they need the protection of government regulation and the bargaining power that comes from a large risk pool. This is literally the opposite approach from McCain, who attempted to unwind the employer-based insurance and encourage families to purchase health coverage on the individual market. The core elements of this plan, in other words, make it the same type of plan Democrats are offering. A plan that enlarges consumer buying pools rather than shrinks them. It's pretty much exactly what I'd expect a Blue Dog Democrat to propose. And it's further evidence that the argument over health reform is narrowing, rather than widening. And it's narrowing in a direction that favors the Democrats.
May 20, 2009; 12:06 PM ET
Categories: Health Reform
Save & Share: Previous: Who Should Get the Praise for the Credit Card Bill?
Next: Can We Make Financial Products as Safe as Toasters?
Posted by: scott1959 | May 20, 2009 12:13 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: cpage1 | May 20, 2009 1:27 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: roespan | May 20, 2009 5:53 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: massmarba | May 20, 2009 7:10 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: catofan | May 20, 2009 7:55 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: FlacidCasual | May 20, 2009 10:03 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: wjd1 | May 20, 2009 10:07 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: catofan | May 20, 2009 11:02 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: csl35 | May 20, 2009 11:40 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: catofan | May 21, 2009 6:31 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: dasimon | May 21, 2009 3:51 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: catofan | May 21, 2009 8:45 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: dasimon | May 23, 2009 11:57 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: enoughalready3 | May 25, 2009 4:21 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: catofan | May 25, 2009 5:57 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.