As Long As Everyone is in Agreement
Thinking a bit more about EJ Dionne's column today, one of the reasons Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh get taken very seriously by the media is that there's ample evidence that they speak for, and are influential among, a significant bloc of Republican lawmakers. That case has been well-made elsewhere. But the other piece is that there's little evidence that Limbaugh and Gingrich are significantly more radical than the bulk of conservative lawmakers. Gingrich, of course, led the House Republicans. Limbaugh, for his part, was made an honorary member of the Republican Congressional Caucus when they took over in 1994.
This, for instance, sounds a lot like Limbaugh: "This is going to sound radical, I don’t mean for it to be radical — but to me, the greatest threat to America is not necessarily a recession or even another terrorist attack. The greatest threat to America is a liberal media bias."
Except it wasn't Rush Limbaugh. It was Rep. Lamar Smith from Texas. And Smith is literally forming a "Media Fairness Caucus" made up of a dozen House Republicans to push his case. When you're quoting Limbaugh on behalf of folks like Smith, you're not really doing anyone an ideological disservice.
(Photo credit: AP Photo/Rob Carr)
June 4, 2009; 3:42 PM ET
Save & Share: Previous: Derivatives for Farmers
Next: Bob Bennett's Peculiar Fear of British Health Care
Posted by: BigTunaTim | June 4, 2009 4:54 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: hoi_polloi | June 5, 2009 6:56 AM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.