Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Public Wants Fewer Jobs, More Severe Recession

The NBC/Wall Street Journal poll that emerged last week got a lot of attention for finding that 76 percent of Americans think the choice of a public plan is important for health reform. That cheered progressives, for obvious reasons. But looking through the whole poll, there's actually quite a bit that augurs poorly for Obama's agenda. Check out this bit on priorities, for instance:


Elsewhere, 58 percent think that "the President and the Congress should worry more about keeping the budget deficit down, even though it may mean it will take longer for the economy to recover." Fifty-three percent think the government was wrong to bail out Chrysler and GM. A 39 percent plurality thinks the stimulus was a bad idea.

This isn't, of course, the first time that the American people have had pretty terrible opinions about how to handle the economy. Paul Krugman dug up some striking numbers from 1935 showing that 70 percent of Americans wanted the Roosevelt administration to balance the budget, and the White House, heeding public opinion, promptly contracted its economic policy and tossed the country into the brutal 1937 recession.

Which is to say, there are three ways of reading this poll. One is to say that Americans are concerned with federal spending and government intervention. Another is to say that Americans don't understand macroeconomics. And another is to say that Americans want a radically higher unemployment rate and a much more severe recession.

Which gets to one of the difficulties posed by this sort of poll. The obvious way to report the results is that the public is growing skeptical of Obama's agenda. But for all that, the public is pretty likely to also respond negatively to an economic collapse. A poll can tell you a lot about what a voter doesn't like in this reality. It's not always so good about distinguishing between the relevant alternatives. That, in theory, is David Axelrod's job.

By Ezra Klein  |  June 22, 2009; 9:03 AM ET
Categories:  Polls  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: How Much Will Cap-and-Trade Cost You?
Next: Why Is Meet the Press Having So Many Problems With Health Care?


"Another is to say that Americans don't understand macroeconomics."

One of the key goals of the corptocracy for the last 30 years has been to make sure that American's don't understand macroeconomics. Harder to steal from people that know what you're doing.

Posted by: PPhilly | June 22, 2009 11:20 AM | Report abuse

Almost all reporting in the MSM focuses on the short term costs of reform. There is never any analysis of the longer term savings from reform, or the risk of un-reformed health care spending bankrupting the government and many Americans.

When all reports are consistently framed in terms of short term deficit spending, and how much each plan would "cost" it's going to be a tough road. There's also a consistent frame of more "moderate" plans costing less (in the short term) with no analysis of the longer term impact of half-assed plans.

If you do get to go on the TV, you may wanna emphasize this.

Posted by: jeirvine | June 22, 2009 11:33 AM | Report abuse

As you have argued in the past, health care reform is the most important adjustment we can make for salvaging our fiscal position. When progressive Democrats make that argument, and sell their position to the majority of Americans on a public option, the President's agenda will be in much better shape. This poll may simply be an indicator that we on the left need to pick up our game.

Posted by: frankiannuzzi | June 22, 2009 11:35 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company