The Max Baucus Committee
There's been a lot of anxiety over leaks outlining the compromises being made in the Senate Finance Committee's health-care plan. Among these compromises is a rejection of the public option and the absence of an employer mandate. Disappointing stuff. But, at this point, completely predictable.
Look at this picture. Study it. This is who is in the room helping Baucus put together his bill. Olympia Snowe, Mike Enzi, Chuck Grassley, Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad. In a Senate of 60 Democrats and 40 Republicans, the health-care reform bill is being written by three centrist Democrats, one centrist Republicans, and two conservative Republicans. And until last week, Orrin Hatch was in the room, too.
This is not the Finance Committee's bill. This is the Max Baucus Committee's Bill. And there's not a liberal -- or even a Democrat traditionally associated with health-care policy -- working on it. Jay Rockefeller, chairman of Finance's health subcommittee, is not included in the negotiations. Nor is Ron Wyden, who has written the Healthy Americans Act. Chuck Schumer isn't in the room, nor is John Kerry, Debbie Stabenow or Maria Cantwell.
The question is whether Baucus's final product will matter. Rockefeller and the other Democrats on the committee have felt excluded from the negotiations and will want major changes before they can sign onto the final product. Then the Finance bill will have to be reconciled with the more liberal legislation built by the HELP Committee. Then it will have to go to the floor, where it will need the support of people like Russ Feingold and Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown just as much as it will need Ben Nelson and Evan Bayh. And then, if it passes those tests, it will have to be reconciled with the House's legislation.
All of which is to say that the Baucus process is attracting an immense amount of interest, but the product may not look a lot like the bill that Congress eventually considers. And the reason is simple enough: Baucus's process doesn't look a lot like Congress. Baucus, Enzi, Snow, Grassley, Bingaman, and Conrad all think of themselves as dealmakers, but right now, they're not cutting a deal on behalf of anyone but themselves.
Photo credit: Melina Mara -- The Washington Post Photo.
July 28, 2009; 11:14 AM ET
Categories: Health Reform
Save & Share: Previous: Bill Kristol Says Things That Are The Opposite of True
Next: More on Max Baucus's Gang of Six
Posted by: smhjr1 | July 28, 2009 11:20 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: jkaren | July 28, 2009 11:36 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: mayorm | July 28, 2009 11:43 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: jamesoneill | July 28, 2009 11:59 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: dday212 | July 28, 2009 12:02 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Chris_ | July 28, 2009 12:22 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: RedBird27 | July 28, 2009 12:35 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: farrell_bill | July 28, 2009 12:44 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: J-NC | July 28, 2009 2:02 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: mgnm | July 28, 2009 2:11 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: AdviseConsent | July 28, 2009 3:34 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.