What's Going on in the House (or Is Health-Care Reform Becoming a Prisoner's Dilemma?)
News reports filtering out of the House suggest that talks between Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman and the seven Blue Dogs on his committee have broken down. The situation is dire enough that Waxman is declaring his willingness to bypass his committee and bring the bill straight to the floor.
The central issue here is simple enough: The Blue Dogs want Waxman to make concessions he doesn't want to make. The sticking points, according to sources close to the process, are the public plan -- Blue Dogs still want a trigger option -- and the administration's proposal, which the Blue Dogs support, to create an independent commission able to set Medicare payment rates and make reforms. Waxman and others worry that a Republican administration and Congress could use this panel to undermine the Medicare program.
You can take Waxman's statements one of a couple ways. His willingness to bring the bill directly to the floor undermines the bargaining power of the Blue Dogs: It means they don't have veto power over the bill. This could, in other words, be a negotiating tactic on Waxman's part to soften the Blue Dogs' position. But if that doesn't work, it could also mean exactly what it says: That he's going to push the bill straight to the floor.
That would ensure some bad headlines, and an angry Blue Dog caucus. But versions of this bill have passed two other committees. Energy and Commerce isn't strictly necessary. Waxman's threat to bring the bill to the floor means that Pelosi and Waxman think they have the votes whether or not Energy and Commerce approves the legislation. And that may not be such a bad outcome, either for the Democrats or the Blue Dogs.
Some sources are speculating that the Blue Dogs are getting cold feet as they watch Max Baucus dither. Many of them felt burned by the hard and damaging vote on the cap-and-trade bill, as it looks like nothing will come of it in the Senate. Committing themselves to a health-care bill before the Senate shows its hand carries similar risks, and they're no longer in a risk-taking mood. The worst outcome for conservative Democrats in the House is that they're on record voting for a health-care reform bill that dies in the Senate and is judged a catastrophic example of liberal overreach.
The problem, of course, is that the more dissension there is among Democrats in the House, the less pressure there'll be on the Senate Democrats to make a hard vote on health-care reform. This makes health-care reform something of a prisoner's dilemma for conservative Democrats. If Blue Dogs in the House and centrists in the Senate both put it on the line to pass the bill, they're both better off. But if one puts it on the line and the other whiffs, then the other pays the price.
Photo credit: Bloomberg News Photo .
July 24, 2009; 5:00 PM ET
Categories: Health Reform
Save & Share: Previous: A President You Could Drink a Beer With. After He Called You Stupid, Anyway
Next: No Cost Controls Without Coverage Expansions
Posted by: colby1983 | July 24, 2009 5:06 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: JonWa | July 24, 2009 5:28 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: umesh409 | July 24, 2009 11:27 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Ulium | July 25, 2009 12:31 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Ulium | July 25, 2009 12:42 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Hamilton2 | July 25, 2009 4:31 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: hartlex | July 25, 2009 6:01 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: andrewp111 | July 25, 2009 7:59 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: DaMav | July 26, 2009 4:22 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: johnhiggins1990 | July 26, 2009 8:51 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Benadork | July 26, 2009 9:09 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: staticvars | July 26, 2009 10:09 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.