Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama and Smerconish

On Thursday, Barack Obama went on Michael Smerconish's radio show to defend his health-care reform effort before a more skeptical audience. Smerconish is a right-wing radio host, but he can conduct a very good interview, as this transcript shows:

SMERCONISH: Hi, everybody. Welcome back to the program. I'm Michael Smerconish. What an honor for me to say I'm live at the White House and I'm joined by the President of the United States.

Mr. President, what an honor for me, and thank you, sir, for this privilege, and thank you for coming back to my radio program.

OBAMA: Michael, it's great to be on the show again. Every time we've been on it's been a great time. So I appreciate the opportunity.

SMERCONISH: Folks are stacked up, as you might imagine. They're anxious to pose some questions about health care to the President of the United States. More than 5,000 e-mail suggestions have flowed through my Web site in just the last 24 hours alone.

If it's all right, I'll start by posing a couple of questions and some of the things that I continue to hear from folks, and we'll welcome phone callers, as well.

Allow me, sir, to begin with this. Did Secretary Sebelius misspeak last weekend? You know, a great deal has been made as to what she said pertaining to the so-called public option.

OBAMA: She really didn't misspeak. The surprising thing is she'd been saying this all along. She said the same thing a month ago. And let me just describe what the issue is here. We have consistently talked about the need for health care reform because family premiums are going up three times faster than inflation and wages. The costs of Medicare and Medicaid will bankrupt this country if we don't reduce the cost inflation of health care. You've got families who can't get health care because of preexisting conditions or they bump up against some lifetime cap if a family member gets really ill.

So what we've said is there are a number of components of health care. One is that for people who already have health insurance, they can keep their health insurance, but we're going to have some consumer protections to regulate how insurers operate. For example, they can't prohibit people from getting it, health insurance, because of a preexisting condition. They can't have lifetime caps or yearly caps that prevent people from getting the care that they need.

We're also going — for people who don't have health insurance — to set up a system similar to what Congress has, where you can buy into a bigger pool, get better rates, have better protections around you. You would be buying that insurance from private insurers.

But one of the options we talked about was a public option where there wouldn't be a profit motive involved. It would be non-for-profit, and that public option would give you affordable health insurance.

Now, what we've said is we think that's a good idea. But we haven't said that that's the only aspect of health insurance. And what she essentially said was, is that all these other insurance reforms are just as important as the public option. The press got a little excited and some folks on the left got a little excited about this. Our position hasn't changed. We think that the key is cost control, competition, making sure that people have good, quality options. If we're able to achieve that, that's the end that we're seeking. And the means -- you know, we can have some good arguments about what the best way to achieve it is, but we've got to change because the status quo is unsustainable.

SMERCONISH: Mr. President, there's a mindset among many folks in many audiences who say that the endgame, it's all about single-payer; that it's a public option or it's a cooperative. And sir, you know that there's a perception out there that you want it all — you know, you want to be in the banks, you want to be in the automotive industry, and now you want to be in health care. Can you address that mindset?

OBAMA: I absolutely can. First of all, look, the intervention in the banks wasn't started by me, it was started by a conservative Republican administration — and rightly so, because our banks were on the verge of meltdown. The only thing that we've done is said, let's put in place some financial regulations to make sure that this doesn't happen again.

The auto interventions weren't started by me — they were started by a conservative Republican administration. The only thing that we did was rather than just write GM and Chrysler a blank check, we said, you know what, if you're going to get any more taxpayer money, you've got to be accountable. They went through a record bankruptcy, and now GM for the first time is actually hiring folks back.

So I know that there's this perception that somehow we have engaged in these extraordinary interventions. Part of it had to do with the worst financial crisis in history. And the fact that both the auto bailout and the bank bailout were started under a previous, conservative Republican administration indicates the fact that this wasn't ideological; this was a matter of necessity.

Now, as far as health care goes, I've consistently said I would love the private marketplace to be handling this without any government intervention. The problem is it's not working. What we're seeing is about 14,000 folks lose their health insurance every single day. We are seeing healt-care inflation go up about twice as fast as regular inflation. Businesses are being crippled by it. Small businesses especially have almost no access to the marketplace because they've got no leverage with insurance companies.

So all we've said is let's keep the private system intact, but let's make sure that people who right now can't get health insurance — about 46 million — that they're able to buy into the market. And number two, let's have some consumer protections to make sure that those of us who have health insurance don't end up getting a bad deal because we didn't read the fine print and we think that we have coverage; when we finally get sick and we need it, it turns out that we're vulnerable because insurance companies aren't operating in the interests of their customers.

SMERCONISH: I like to drive an MDX and an F-150, and I've communicated by e-mail in the last 24 hours with the woman who sold me the MDX and the guy who sold me the F-150, and each of them, Mr. President, are saying that Cash for Clunkers has been a great idea and a wonderful initiative and they closed a lot of deals, but the payments are late. And I'm hearing from a number of folks who say, come on, if the federal government can't get it together relative to Cash for Clunkers, I don't want to entrust my health care to the federal government.

OBAMA: Well, let me first address Cash for Clunkers. It has been successful beyond anybody's imagination. And we're now slightly victims of success because the thing happened so quick, there was so much more demand than anybody expected, that dealers were overwhelmed with applications.

Now, this program has only been going on for a few weeks, and we have hired three times as many people to process this stuff as we originally had. There has not been extraordinary delays on the U.S. government's part — I understand dealers want to get their money back as soon as possible, but the fact of the matter is this is a good-news story; they are seeing sales that they have not seen in years.

And they will get their money, but we've got to process it properly, because if we were careless about it, if we were just sending out checks where applications were incomplete and so on, first of all, we'd be breaking the law because there are statutes set up in terms of how this is supposed to go; and secondly, there'd probably be some story — you'd be asking me about scandals where there were a whole bunch of checks of taxpayer money being wasted, going out to people who hadn't actually bought cars.

So I think this is actually a high-class problem to have — that we're selling too many cars too quickly and there's some backlog in the application process. It is getting fixed.

SMERCONISH: Mr. President, Ernie is a listener of mine on WTKK in Boston and wishes to pose the following question. Ernie, go ahead for the President of the United States.

Q: Thank you, Michael. Mr. President —

OBAMA: How are you, Ernie?

Q: I'm good. Thank you for taking this call.

OBAMA: Great to talk to you.

Q: I understand you've said that the federal health care plan for government employees is a pretty good plan.

OBAMA: It is.

Q: And Congress has voted, to my understanding, not to join the public plan once it passes because they want to keep their good federal plan. Would you be willing to either urge Congress to have the federal employees join the public plan, or would you be willing to urge Congress to somehow open up the federal health plan to all Americans?

SMERCONISH: Thank you, Ernie. I hear this all the time, Mr. President.

OBAMA: Well, it's a great question, Ernie. First of all, understand that currently federal employees have a very good health-care plan because they're able to leverage the insurance companies. There are so many members of their — of the federal workforce that they can get the best rates possible. Every insurance company wants to do business with the federal government. So premiums are lower and it's a better deal overall.

The same concept is what we're trying to do in setting up what's called a health insurance exchange. Essentially it'd be a marketplace where people who currently don't have health insurance or small businesses could pool their numbers so they have leverage over the insurance companies and they could go on a Web site and look at the various options, the types of various private health insurance plans that are being offered, and choose the one that's best for their families. So we're actually trying to duplicate what exists for federal employees. We want to make that available to everybody else.

Now, what we have said is, let's make a public option one choice of many choices that are available to people who are joining the exchange. And I see nothing wrong with potentially having that public option as one option for federal employees, as well.

But the important thing that I think I have to make absolutely clear: Nobody would be obligated to choose the public option. If you went on that Web site and you said, you know what, Aetna or Blue Cross Blue Shield are offering a good deal and I would rather choose that plan than the public plan, you'd be perfectly free to do so. Nobody would be saying you are obligated to go into a public plan.

SMERCONISH: I think what folks are saying is that they'd love it if you'd stand up and say, whatever it is that we're creating, be it a co-op, be it a public option, whatever name ultimately might be ascribed to it, we in the executive branch, we in the Congress, we will live with exactly these parameters.

OBAMA: I think there would be — I think it would make perfect sense for us to make the public option available to federal employees, as well. But keep in mind it would just be a choice.

SMERCONISH: Understood. Let me keep moving, if I may. Tracy listens on WXNT News Talk 1430 in Indianapolis. Tracy, your question for the President.

Q: Mr. President, thanks for taking my call.

OBAMA: Hi, Tracy.

Q: Hi. Until I heard you say that a private option is just a sliver of your health-care proposal recently, I think myself and many Americans thought that pretty much was your proposal.

OBAMA: I know.

Q: So my question is, could you please quickly list five or six bullet points of what legislation must include for you to be willing to sign it? For instance, employer mandates, tort reform, illegal immigrants — what about them? Must it include a public option?

OBAMA: I'd be happy to. First of all, you mentioned illegal immigrants. This has been an example of just pure misinformation out there. None of the bills that have been voted on in Congress, and none of the proposals coming out of the White House propose giving coverage to illegal immigrants — none of them. That has never been on the table; nobody has discussed it. So everybody who is listening out there, when you start hearing that somehow this is all designed to provide health insurance to illegal immigrants, that is simply not true and has never been the case.

SMERCONISH: What is their fate, if I might ask? Because there's a 1986 law on the book that says if you show up at an ER, you've got to be treated.

OBAMA: Well, that will continue because we don't want a situation in which some child, even if they're an illegal immigrant, shows up in an emergency room with tuberculosis and nobody is giving them treatment, and then they're going back to the playground and playing next to our kids.

So I think there is a basic standard of decency where if somebody is in a death situation or a severe illness, that we're going to provide them emergency care. But nobody has talked about providing health insurance to illegal immigrants. I want to make that absolutely clear.

Now, Tracy, you had a good point about what are the bullet points that I want. Number one, it's got to be deficit-neutral. This has to be paid for, because in the past, some of the health-care plans that we've put forward have not been paid for. A good example of this was the prescription drug benefit for seniors. That was a important thing to do, but we never actually figured out how to pay for it. That just went directly into the deficit and the national debt. We can't afford to do that. So that would be point number one.

Point number two, it has to bend the cost curve. What that means is that we've got to create a plan that experts credibly say will reduce health care inflation, because if all we're doing is adding more people, but we're not controlling costs, that will blow up the deficit over the long term and it will blow up the burdens on individual families and businesses. We've got to get control of our costs. We spend $6,000 more than any other advanced country per person on health care. That's number two.

Number three, we've got to have the insurance reforms I talked about for people who already have health insurance. And that means making sure you can get health insurance even if you've got a preexisting condition; making sure that you're not burdened by lifetime caps; making sure that insurance companies can't drop you just because you get sick or because you're older or because you're not as healthy — so making sure that there are basic insurance protections, that's very important.

Number four is I want to make sure that we have a health exchange, as I just described, that is similar to what members of Congress have where you will have a set of options. If you're a small business, if you're an individual, self-employed, you have trouble getting health insurance right now, you can go and look at a bunch of options. And we've got to make it affordable for middle-class families, so part of the plan has to be that if you can't afford a market-based premium, that we're giving you a little bit of help and you're able to get health insurance.

Choice, competition, reducing costs — those are the things that I want to see accomplished in this health reform bill.

SMERCONISH: Where, Mr. President, does personal responsibility factor into all this? There was a front-page story in USA Today recently that talked about obesity being the single most significant factor — I mean, you're a fit guy. How about rewarding those who get on a StairMaster every day?

OBAMA: Well, the interesting thing is you're already starting to see this happen among a lot of private companies. Safeway, for example, is a company that has done a great job in helping encourage its employees to get fit, and they actually give them an incentive. They say, look, you're going to save X amount on your insurance premiums; you'll see that in your paycheck if you are taking steps to take care of yourself. And I think that creating incentives like that for prevention, for wellness, creating cash incentives for people where it shows up they're saving money on their health insurance because of it, I think that's something that should be part of this.

SMERCONISH: Mr. President, Joe listens to me at Home Base, which is the Big Talker 1210 in Philadelphia. Joseph, go ahead for the President of the United States.

Q: Thank you for taking my call, Mr. President.

OBAMA: Hey, Joe, how are you?

Q: Oh, I'm scared out of my mind talking to you here. (Laughter) I'm a supporter, worked hard for you last year.

OBAMA: I appreciate you.

Q: I'm getting a little ticked off that it feels like the knees are buckling a little bit. You have an overwhelming majority in both the House and the Senate, and you own the whole shooting match. And I'm just not getting — it's very frustrating to watch you try and compromise with a lot of these people who aren't willing to compromise with you.

SMERCONISH: Are your knees buckling? That's his question.

OBAMA: Well, look, I guarantee you, Joe, we are going to get health care reform done. And I know that there are a lot of people out there who have been hand-wringing, and folks in the press are following every little twist and turn of the legislative process. You know, passing a big bill like this is always messy. FDR was called a socialist when he passed Social Security. JFK and Lyndon Johnson, they were both accused of a government takeover of health care when they passed Medicare. This is the process that we go through — because, understandably, the American people have a long tradition of being suspicious of government, until the government actually does something that helps them, and then they don't want anybody messing with whatever gets set up.

And I'm confident we're going to get it done, and as far as negotiations with Republicans, my attitude has always been let's see if we can get this done with some consensus. I would love to have more Republicans engaged and involved in this process. I think early on a decision was made by the Republican leadership that said, look, let's not give them a victory and maybe we can have a replay of 1993-94 when Clinton came in; he failed on health care and then we won in the midterm elections and we got the majority. And I think there's some folks who are taking a page out of that playbook.

But this shouldn't be a political issue. This is a issue for the American people. There are a bunch of Republicans out there who have been working very constructively. One of them, Olympia Snowe in Maine, she's been dedicated on this. Chuck Grassley, Mike Enzi, others — they've been meeting in the Senate Finance Committee. I want to give them a chance to work through these processes.

And we're happy to make sensible compromises. What we're not willing to do is give up on the core principle that Americans who don't have health insurance should get it; that Americans who do have health insurance should get a better deal from insurance companies and have consumer protections. We've got to reduce health care inflation so that everybody can keep the health care that they have. That's going to be my priorities, and I think we can get it done.

SMERCONISH: A bit off-message. Today the Scots released the Lockerbie bomber due to — actually maybe it is health care-related. He's got terminal cancer. Your take on this. A lot of folks very offended over a perceived lack of justice.

OBAMA: We have been in contact with the Scottish government, indicating that we objected to this. And we thought it was a mistake. We're now in contact with the Libyan government, and want to make sure that if in fact this transfer has taken place, that he's not welcomed back in some way, but instead should be under house arrest. We've also obviously been in contact with the families of the Pan Am victims, and indicated to them that we don't think this was appropriate.

SMERCONISH: Mr. President, in each of our prior three conversations, I spoke with you extensively about the need for closure, and we agreed relative to bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri. And as a matter of fact, and this is well-documented — I've written and spoken about it extensively — things that you said during the course of the campaign played a critical role in my personal decision-making pertaining to the 2008 election. So I feel I'd be derelict in my duty if I didn't come here today and say, where are we? I know we had a major victory recently with the number-one individual for the Taliban in those tribal regions. But pertaining to bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri, where is it?

OBAMA: Well, here's where we're at. We are continuing to ramp up the pressure in Afghanistan. And we had a — what appears to be a successful election in Afghanistan despite the Taliban's effort to disrupt it. You've got General McChrystal now over there and more troops who are putting pressure on the eastern and southern portions of Afghanistan.

On the other hand, you've got the Pakistani army for the first time actually fighting in a very aggressive way, and that's how we took out Baitullah Mehsud —

SMERCONISH: Right.

OBAMA: — the top Taliban leader in Pakistan, who was also one of bin Laden's key allies. So the goal here is essentially to have a pincher where we are squeezing them on both sides, we're eliminating their allies, it's making it more difficult for them to communicate, making it more difficult for them to operate safe havens, and over time what we hope to do is to flush them out. We are going to keep on putting pressure on them, and I know that it's at great cost. I have to sign letters to family members who have fallen and a lot more are falling in Afghanistan than in Iraq. And as a consequence, we've got to make sure that we are really focused on finishing the job in Afghanistan, but it's going to take some time.

SMERCONISH: Mr. President, Susan listens to WOR News Radio 710 in New York City. Susan, go ahead for the President of the United States.

Q: Yes, thank you very much, Mr. President, for talking to us directly about this important issue.

OBAMA: Thank you, Susan.

Q: We all want reform. I guess it's really a matter of what the best solution is. And a lot of us feel that the federal government is just not equipped for or it's their role to be getting involved in delivering health-care services. And we're very concerned that most of the money will actually go — instead of taking care of people, it will go to, you know, the cost of administering a huge government bureaucracy. Why not do something more like giving incentives to the states? Like here in New York we already have free health care for people who can't afford it. And, you know, it should only be for people who can't afford it, not for the 20- and 30-somethings that choose to spend their money on SUVs and the latest electronic gadgets. And it's not free because we all know that we're going to be paying for it, and it should be only for the people who can't really afford it. And we want to have our own health-care decisions locally, and we don't want the federal government making those decisions for us.

SMERCONISH: Is there a state solution here, Mr. President?

OBAMA: Well, look, first of all, Susan, I think that it's important to understand that part of the health reform proposal that we've put forward would involve the states. The states in some cases would be empowered to expand Medicaid to cover more people, the same way that they've been able to cover more children under the Children's Health Insurance Program. So a sizable portion of the people who are currently uninsured would in fact be getting their insurance through the states. That's how the current Medicaid program is able to allow states to cover more people.

Keep in mind that nobody is talking about the government administering all of health care. What we're talking about here is a public option that people could sign up for, but in that situation they'd have to operate like any private insurer. They'd have to be collecting premiums and so forth.

The track record for government administering health care actually is surprisingly good. Medicare, for example, a government program, has much lower administrative costs than private insurers do. Now, part of it is, is because they don't have — either somebody is qualified or they're not, and so signing them up is a lot more automatic.

But that points to one of the big problems that we have. In private insurance, huge amounts of insurance companies are spending a lot of money and a lot of effort and a lot of staff just trying to cherry-pick people who are healthy, and sign them up, and then eliminate people who are sick. And part of what we want to do here is just reform the system so that insurance companies are operating more fairly to all people.

If you're young, actually, it's easier to get health insurance these days. The really tough population are folks who are from 50 to 64. Maybe they just got laid off. Maybe they're self-employed. They have a whale of a time trying to buy health insurance, and we want to make sure that there is a market for them.

Last point that I would make is that — you mention the fact that a lot of young people opt out. One of the things that we would do under reform is to say, if you want, you can stay on your health insurance or your parents' health insurance up to the age of 26. That would cover a lot of young people who they fall in that gap. Their first job doesn't necessarily offer them insurance. It gives them a way of having coverage until they get that job that has a little bit more security.

SMERCONISH: You're needed across town. I appreciate very much the privilege of coming to the White House. Mr. President, thank you so much for being on the Michael Smerconish program.

OBAMA: Mike, it's always a pleasure. And I want to thank all your listeners. Terrific questions. There's a great dialogue that takes place on this show, and I just hope that we can continue that dialogue in the same spirit to solve some of America's big problems.

By Ezra Klein  |  August 20, 2009; 4:00 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: What Are Readers Worth?
Next: The Best Paper You'll Read Today

Comments

He did well, but needs to explain like Anthony Weiner did that what we are talking about is not who provides the actual care, but who gets billed by the health care providers when you do get care. Is it the Gov't, like in Medicare or Medicaid, or is it the insurance co? No one is saying the gov't is going to actually provide the care, like expanding the VA to cover everyone or something. It is the payment mechanism we are fighting over, because when the payer is a private company, their primary interest is profit, and they have big bureaucracies too, as anyone who had to call their 800 number knows.

Posted by: Mimikatz | August 20, 2009 4:05 PM | Report abuse

Michael Smerconish is not Hannity, O'Liely or Gingrich (and ten or twenty other know-nothings), that's for sure.

But Obama is still in denial on Grassley and the Sen. GOP. It's like Eisenhower praising Herman Goering for his leadership. It makes my teeth itch and my mind resonate on off-key singing.

I think Barak will regret saying "I guarantee you, Joe, we are going to get health care reform done." over and over. That may be true if reform is defined as whatever Grassley, Bayh, Nelson, et.al. will agree to: almost nothing. Those who take seriously a 'guarantee' of reform won't be fooled and are quite likely to be quite more angry than if we had reform defined the GOP way: roll back things to the McKinley era.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR | August 20, 2009 4:18 PM | Report abuse

This was a REALLY good interview!

Posted by: maritza1 | August 20, 2009 4:38 PM | Report abuse

The comment on illegal immigrants in ERs was a little shocking, especially coming from Pres. Obama. Is "they might infect our children with TB" some sort of official talking point? That can't possibly be the official rationale for immediately treating children with infectious diseases when their parents bring them to hospitals. It really doesn't matter who the target audience of the interview was, that answer is still unacceptable.

Posted by: nmendoza | August 20, 2009 5:33 PM | Report abuse

nmendoza,
Obama's answer to that question may have been deeply cynical and calculated to appeal to xenophobes, but it's worth keeping in mind the very next thing he said:

""So I think there is a basic standard of decency where if somebody is in a death situation or a severe illness, that we're going to provide them emergency care.""

So it's not like he wasn't also pushing that part of it.

Posted by: WarrenTerra | August 20, 2009 5:39 PM | Report abuse

President Obama is an incredibly bad disembler. I would say liar, but when he says Sec Sebelius didn't mispeak he's telling the truth. She said exactly what he wanted her to say, it was a trial balloon. Then when Nancy Pelosi yanked his chain he had Robert Gibbs lie for him and say she mispoke. The problem Obama has with Health care is that he is way to cute with words for his own good. Just like he was in this interview. Its hard to call it an out an out lie, but its certainly isn't the truth. Evasion and side stepping is a good way to describe it to avoid the hard word....lying! Who wants to call the President of the U.S. a liar! Its hard to believe that Obama is so arrogant he doesn't realize that the American people caught on some time ago, but apparently Obama's ego and arrogance have no limits.

Posted by: valwayne | August 20, 2009 9:52 PM | Report abuse

It is a good interview, except in one particular, which is quite crucial, and quite telling: The one place where Pres. Obama's case falters is when he raises the issue of cost containment. He correctly (if very fleetingly) points out the huge excess costs our present system entails, and he claims that cost containment will be one of the 'core principles' he will insist upon. Where he fails however is in providing a credible account of how this vast amount of waste will be reduced. Why?

I think the reason is clear enough: The huge excess cost burden in our system, relative to other first-world systems, comes from private market power exercised by various health care industry participants--insurers, drug companies, equipment makers, hospitals, doctors. The excess costs we face are the rents these providers and intermediaries extract.

To reduce these costs in any substantial way (while leaving private insurers in business) would require a countervailing power, whether in the form a very sizable pubic payer, free to excercise its monopsony power in opposition to the various forms of monopoly power enjoyed by other industry participants, or else in the form a very robust regulatory authority empowered to, in effect, set prices for everyone in the system.

Neither of these options make Mr. Obama's list of 'core principles' on which he will not compromise. In practice, therefore, serious cost containment really doesn't make that list either, despite the fact that he cites it as a nominal goal.

Indeed, the ethereal quality of Mr. Obama's 'core principles' of reform is the most striking thing about them--the way they tend to float in a place far removed from any possible implementation, and thus from any possible controversy.

What it comes to is that Mr. Obama is not prepared to place at the center of the reform debate a sustained, robust indictment of the effects of private market power on our health care system, nor a positive argument for the greater use of public power as necessary counterweight. Without that willingness, certain of his goals will remain among the things devoutly hoped for, without ever joining the things for which we are prepared to fight.

Posted by: amileoj | August 21, 2009 12:21 AM | Report abuse

The key is Obama saying that Sebelius didn't misspeak when she dissed the Public Option, that she'd ben saying this all along. This deconstructs as the following:

OBAMA: Look. Yes I did during the Democratic primaries and during the presidential campaign unambiguously commit to a public option. And I also unambiguously said I was not going to be beholden to lobbies. But don't be a silly goose. I was speaking to the American people then in campaign mode. Once I took office and started speaking to the people really in power, like those lobbies and the execs who hire them to protect their bonuses and private jets, I made real commitments to them. Man to man, in the same room.

US: Yeah, I missed that CSPAN broadcast.

OBAMA: Um. Anyway, I made Billy Tauzin a promise that PhRMA's members would not have to give up anything substantive in health care reform. Indeed, the supposed $80bn they will "contribute in savings" over 10 years is simply a promise to not raise their prices as much over inflation as their previous scenarios said they might be able to get away with. No actual savings there, of course, and more people in the insurance pool to soak as well -- with government subsidies making up the slack. But it sounds nice, though, I'll admit, a bit chintzy when you realize that the revenue base for those 10 years for the drug companies is expected to be on the order of $3 trillion.

US: Oh.

OBAMA: Anyway, through my buddy Max, I also committed to Billy and people from the health insurance industry that even if there was a Public Option it would be so eviscerated that they would have nothing to fear. And all they had to do was run a few TV ads pointing out what a visionary I am for pushing for health care "reform."

US: Oh, we understand now. You made campaign promises to US and real promises to Billy Tauzin and the health insurance industry. And while it's OK to go back on campaign promises -- everybody expects that -- it would be dishonorable for you to go back on face-to-face promises you made to Billy Tauzin, et al.

OBAMA: Precisely.

Posted by: billyblog | August 21, 2009 6:07 AM | Report abuse

what Smerconish SHOULD HAVE ASKED the President is if for example in H.R. 3200 there is an 85% loss ratio requirement (which i've been calling for) then WHY do we need a public option even in states with little or no competition because that will end any thought of price gouging.

The answer: because government wants to take over healthcare that's why. At least be honest with your intentions Mr President.

Posted by: visionbrkr | August 22, 2009 10:22 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company