Why must we have double-digit unemployment for the foreseeable future?
James Galbraith points fingers:
Technically it would have been fairly easy, 10 months ago, to get this bus back on the road. There could have been open-ended fiscal assistance to stop the budget hemorrhage of the states and cities. There could have been a jobs program and effective foreclosure relief. There could have been a payroll tax holiday. There could have been a strategy for sustained massive effort on infrastructure, energy and climate. There could have been prompt corrective action to resolve, instead of coddle, the worst of the banks.
I mostly don't blame President Obama; he and his team went as far as they felt they could. I blame the head-in-the-sand politicians in Congress, the over-optimistic forecasters, the half-educated press, and the power of the financial lobby. I blame the avatars of fiscal virtue, the public debt scare-mongerers, the astrologers for whom thirteen significant digits (a trillion) for the stimulus package was just too much. I blame the Senate, which hands the balance of power to small states at the expense of disaster areas like California, Florida and New York. I do blame the Bush-Obama financial policy team, who either believed that "credit would flow again" if you stuffed the banks with money, or knew that it wouldn't.
Posted by: bmull | November 23, 2009 6:58 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: MiltonRecht | November 23, 2009 8:17 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: hughmaine | November 24, 2009 12:02 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: tomtildrum | November 24, 2009 11:37 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: rosshunter | November 24, 2009 1:11 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.