In praise of Manmohan Singh
Steve Coll offers a paean to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and the surprisingly stable democracy he's helped nurture:
Singh’s low profile is misleading in important respects, however. His counterparts in the rising Hindu-nationalist movement have made more noise and been more proactive in reshaping post-Cold War Indian politics, but Singh has outlasted them all and will be remembered as a seminal figure of India’s transition from socialism and Soviet-leaning nonalignment to managed capitalism and rising power status. He has in many ways been an indispensable figure in India’s recent transitions. As finance minister during the late, sclerotic socialist period, he quietly helped steer the treasury through various close fiscal calls. He defied political convention and called for India to fight off its anti-colonial hangover, recognize the accumulating failure of its state-run economy, and embrace the opportunities of post-Cold War global trade. During the nineteen-nineties, when the Hindu nationalists rose to power, in large part because of their appeal to the country’s emerging urban business classes, Singh helped hold a fragmenting Congress leadership together, in service of Rajiv Gandhi’s Italian-born widow, Sonia, who embraced the Sikh economist as her political partner. When the Hindu nationalists finally ran out of steam, Singh steered Congress back into power, first in unwieldy alliance with leftist parties, and now, finally, in possession of a solid majority.
It was Singh, more than any individual in India, who was prepared to invest his political career in the pursuit of a transformational peace with Pakistan. It was Singh, after the Mumbai attacks, which came on the cusp of national elections, who had the courage to campaign for reelection on a platform of steely restraint -- and who was rewarded by Indian voters. His record may not stand with the great political figures of our age -- Mandela, Gorbachev. In his own country’s history, he certainly does not rank with the Gandhis and Nehrus. Yet he is one of those neglected, careful, seemingly incorruptible, admirable figures that India’s independence movement and democracy have managed to produce regularly.
Photo credit: Molly Reilly/Reuters.
December 8, 2009; 11:20 AM ET
Categories: Foreign Policy
Save & Share: Previous: Does Medicare discriminate against rural hospitals?
Next: Hoyer: Deadlocks make Congress 'less relevant every day'
Posted by: bmull | December 8, 2009 12:03 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: sreesarma | December 8, 2009 12:16 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.