Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Scrutiny for the Super Fed

As Matt Yglesias says, the erosion of the Federal Reserve's vaunted independence has to do with the fact that the Federal Reserve isn't majestically presiding over an endless boom anymore. Poor performance invites more aggressive oversight.

But I'd add that the Federal Reserve is also becoming a different, and bigger, beast than it used to be. The extraordinary measures it undertook during the crisis, the decision to directly purchase securities, and the decision to house an expanded consumer protection division all change the nature of the Federal Reserve. It stands to reason that the contract between the agency and the political system would have to be renegotiated. The more responsibilities and powers the Fed takes on, the more it will have to interface with Congress. And that's proper.

By Ezra Klein  |  May 5, 2010; 6:05 PM ET
Categories:  Federal Reserve  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: The foreclosure crisis and Faisal Shahzad
Next: Republicans and Democrats continue to agree on FinReg


But Ezra -- given the poor track record of Congress now and over the past 15 years or so -- doesn't more "interface" mean more political pressures on the Fed rather than greater oversight?

Posted by: texassideoats | May 6, 2010 7:13 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company