Congress at its best
As some of you know, the conference committee that finished the financial reform bill televised its deliberations on C-SPAN. That was a big step toward a form of transparency that people said they wanted, but they wanted it more in the abstract: The proceedings didn't exactly dominate the Nielsen ratings. Jonathan Bernstein says that's too bad:
I wrote an item earlier in the week casting doubt on the idea that people would ever pay attention to the mind-numbingly boring details of the banking bill conference committee, but I should have added one other thing: It's too bad that they don't. It makes Congress look good. They're obviously hard at work (and going late into the night at times); they seem to know what they're doing; and overall it's a much better side of Congress than most people ever see. There's some posturing, sure, but a whole lot less than people are used to. ... I don't think people would watch this and get the impression that politicians are preening clowns, which is exactly the impression people will have of Senate Judiciary when their hearing gets started, at least if past results are any guide to future performance.
My suggestion for those of you reading this -- and if you are, you're certainly in the upper sliver of high-information, high-interest citizens when it comes to politics and public affairs -- my suggestion is that if you've never watched a congressional committee markup or conference committee, that you make an effort to watch one. Floor action, hearings, election campaigns ... that's when we see our members of Congress, but it isn't when they do serious legislating. Now, a fair amount of legislating goes on behind closed doors -- which is entirely appropriate, by the way. But still, if you're interested in politics, I really do recommend watching a mark-up sometime. Well, at least fifteen minutes, half an hour, something like that, to get a taste of it. I'm certainly not claiming that if more people watched committee markups that everyone would love Congress; I know everyone hates Congress, and they always have and they always will. I'm just saying that it would be nice if at least those who care the most and spend the most time on politics would at least get some sense of what Congress actually does when it writes laws.
June 25, 2010; 11:00 AM ET
Save & Share: Previous: FinReg finished?
Next: Research desk responds: How generous is the United States?
Posted by: bdballard | June 25, 2010 11:09 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: srw3 | June 25, 2010 11:27 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: rat-raceparent | June 25, 2010 11:38 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: DubiousAdvocate | June 25, 2010 11:50 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: madjoy | June 25, 2010 12:16 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Patrick_M | June 25, 2010 12:46 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: rmgregory | June 25, 2010 1:49 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: randrewm | June 25, 2010 2:21 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: 64176417 | June 25, 2010 2:22 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: srw3 | June 25, 2010 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: madjoy | June 25, 2010 2:30 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: SD619 | June 25, 2010 2:51 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: dagr2 | June 27, 2010 9:57 AM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.