Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Research Desk predicts: How much revenue would closing the hedge-fund loophole bring in?

By Dylan Matthews

jackjudge4000yahoocom asks:

If the carried interest loophole was closed how much revenue would be raised?

The "carried interest loophole" refers to a quirk of the tax code that results in lower tax rates for general partners (GPs) of investment funds, such as hedge fund managers. Generally, GPs receive two forms of compensation: a management fee, which is a percentage (2 percent, usually) of the firm's total assets, and "carried interest," a percentage (usually 20 percent) of the firm's profits. The management fee is taxed like any other form of income, but carried interest is taxed as investment income, which can face a top rate as low at 15 percent.

Hedge fund managers and other fund GPs, of course, usually make quite a bit of money, so this loophole provides a substantial tax break to a group of high earners.

This raises fairness concerns, both because of its regressivity and because income earned in similar institutions, such as investment banks, is subject to normal income taxes, which encourages work in private funds as opposed to other businesses. While the number of people affected by the loophole is relatively small, those who are affected earn enough that subjecting carried interest to normal income taxes could raise a fair bit of revenue. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated (pdf) that closing the loophole along the lines proposed by Senate Democrats would raise $7.4 billion over five years, and $17.7 billion over ten:

revenue_raised_by_closing_carried_interest_loophole,_2010-2020.png

This fix was included in the package of tax extenders that Harry Reid originally bundled with the unemployment benefits extension, but which was filibustered until the tax provisions were all excised as a means of getting swing Republicans on board. However, my colleague Jia Lynn Yang reports that the tax extenders bill is still on the docket for this Congress, and so another vote on closing the carried interest loophole could come before the midterms.

By Ezra Klein  |  August 2, 2010; 2:41 PM ET
Categories:  Taxes  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Lunch break
Next: Blame the states?

Comments

Can we please have a brain and call this something better than "carried interest provision?"

Can we call it the "Hedge Fund Loophole?" Maybe call the solution the "Fair Play Tax Fix?" Seriously, I don't care, but we just need something to call it so that people have a freaking CLUE what it is.

Posted by: theorajones1 | August 2, 2010 8:49 PM | Report abuse

if someone doesn't know what carried interest is, i sincerely doubt that a new name will substantially better people's awareness of carry issues. por ejemplo, the name "hedge fund loophole" would be retarded, given that the carry obviously doesn't include the majority of funds rev. which instead get short term capital gains treatment.

while i agree on the merits largely, the name change isn't important IMHO...


Posted by: stantheman21 | August 3, 2010 12:46 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company