Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Where the stimulus's NIH money went

Yesterday, I put health-research funding into the basket of stimulus policies that wouldn't do much in the short term but could do a lot in the long term. Today, a reader e-mailed to say I'm wrong and that this money pays out more quickly and directly than I'd anticipated. She passed along this report (pdf) from a medical research group that tries to explain more clearly where the money is going. The stimulus was so big that a lot of the projects it funded are totally unknown. But when you drill down into them, they're the sort of things that most of us will eventually be glad were done. Building up our medical research infrastructure is very much one of those.

By Ezra Klein  |  August 10, 2010; 2:10 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Research Desk: How much "other" stimulus has been passed?
Next: Uncertainty cont'd


For what its worth, my wife oversees a Recovery Act NIH-funded public health research grant that has employed seven FTEs--all from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods--since November 1, 2009.

Posted by: mjp8 | August 10, 2010 8:34 PM | Report abuse

It directly saved my full-time position. I was paid half by my hospital department, and half by another NIH grant. My department made enormous cuts because of the recession, and I lost that half of my income. We had a new grant in the pipeline that was languishing for a year and a half, just under the percentile fund point. The first thing NIH did when it got that money is fund all the research that didn't quite make the cut (the percentile is as much determined by their funds, not necessarily the quality of the proposal, you know). So, I was re-hired at full time 50/50 on both grants.

How's that for immediate stimulus?

Posted by: roquelaure_79 | August 11, 2010 3:11 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company