Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

The case against a foreclosure moratorium

Anne Kim is director of Third Way’s domestic-policy program, and Jason Gold is a senior fellow for housing and finance at the think tank. They’ve co-written a paper on why a foreclosure moratorium would be a bad idea. We spoke this afternoon.

Ezra Klein: The paperwork was bad. Beyond that, we know a lot of people were essentially tricked into these loans. So why not have a moratorium on foreclosures until we can figure out how to deal with this?

Anne Kim: There’s no question that there are a huge number of problems in the housing market, but the moratorium won’t be the answer. All the moratorium will do is delay the inevitable. It won’t solve the underlying problem.

EK: Why not? I spoke to John Taylor earlier, and he argued that giving everyone some breather time in which they can sit down and try and hammer out new terms would keep a lot of people in their homes and ultimately be a better outcome.

AK: He’s making an assumption that there’s a rush to foreclosure going on. But the average time to foreclosure is 470-plus days. This is not about banks jumping into foreclosure. Banks are understaffed on processing foreclosures, and they’re far behind on doing them. He also assumes there’s recalcitrance on the bank’s part to working through these loans. The opposite is the case. They don't want foreclosures. But slowing this down won’t help. This is incredibly painful, but you have to get through this excess inventory before the housing market can really recover.

EK: My understanding of your argument is that you're saying it would be actively harmful to have a foreclosure moratorium. Why?

Jason Gold: There are many, many downstream effects that would come from grinding everything to a halt. It puts pending contracts into limbo. It encourages other people to default. It undermines investor confidence by making all transactions in mortgage-backed securities stop. And 1 out of 4 housing purchases right now is a house in foreclosure, and in Nevada it’s 50 percent. You are talking about literally freezing the markets.

EK: If a foreclosure moratorium isn't the answer, how about something like mortgage modifications? When I speak to moratorium advocates, it seems that it's the modifications more than the moratorium that really interests them.

JG: Let’s take two simple examples. For someone who’s unemployed, what do you modify to? Or for someone who got into a liar loan situation and would never be able to afford the home they’re in and really need to be in a more appropriately priced home?

AK: Modification is not a one-size-fits-all solution. There are cases where you need it. And we're very disappointed by the modification efforts the banks and government have done. They’ve been a disaster from start to finish. But it won't be right for every borrower.

EK: So paint me a picture of a world in which we've gone ahead and frozen foreclosures. What does the economy look like?

AK: Imagine home sales slowing to three-fourths of their current rate -- or worse. There's the fear and the lack of clarity from investors down to homeowners. People stop buying homes and people stop selling homes. They stop buying mortgage-backed securities and stop selling them. Yields go up and interest rates go up. There’s an open invitation to litigation.

JG: And taxpayers would bear the cost of it. Fannie and Freddie will have to keep making payments and now that they're under conservatorship, we’ll be the ones carrying that interest and principal. As long as there isn’t any money coming in on the underlying mortgage, Fannie and Freddie have to cover the payments on that mortgage, which means we have to cover them.

By Ezra Klein  | October 20, 2010; 5:10 PM ET
Categories:  Housing Crisis, Interviews  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: The culture of Coates
Next: The case for a foreclosure moratorium

Comments

This doesn't address what I've read about mortgage servicers, who financially benefit from speeding up the forclosure process, and who have a disincentive for the underlying loan to be modified. I'm looking forward to the federal report due out on these entities before I'm ready to accept these arguments.

Posted by: reach4astar2 | October 20, 2010 5:45 PM | Report abuse

I'm not advocating a moratorium, but if the feds don't do something, the morrass is going toget worse. The policy will be set by innumerable state court judges in individual cases and/or class action lawsuits.

Posted by: sash64 | October 20, 2010 6:09 PM | Report abuse

Kim: ¨...you have to get through this excess inventory before the housing market can really recover..¨
Foreclosures increase the supply of houses on the market. Fail.

Posted by: JamesWimberley | October 20, 2010 7:18 PM | Report abuse

Are you looking to refinance your mortgage? Best way is to contact at least three to five lenders for input on mortgage programs and rates. Also search online for "123 Mortgage Refinance" since refinanced my loan to 3.29% with my OK credit history.

Posted by: harryblack21 | October 21, 2010 4:23 AM | Report abuse

Good grief, now it was the fact that people were tricked into taking loans. Are you serious? And James, Kim is correct in her analysis that the excess inventory has to clear the market before a recovery can take place. Delaying foreclosures that are justified does indeed delay the recovery process whether you agree with it or not.

Posted by: novalifter | October 21, 2010 12:08 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company