Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Kent Conrad: 'That makes so much sense that it’s unlikely to happen'

By Ezra Klein

conrafbluetie.JPG

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) is chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, a member of the deficit commission and one of the party's leading voices on tax reform. Recently, he proposed a plan tying an extension of the Bush tax cuts to comprehensive tax reform. Earlier today, he walked me through the details of his proposal, A lightly edited transcript of our conversation follows.

Ezra Klein: I’ve been surprised watching the chaos among the Democrats as they attempt to figure out what to do about the Bush tax cuts. This was a completely predictable legislative battle, and yet it’s been greeted, as far as I can tell, with ample confusion and almost no consensus about how to handle it.

Kent Conrad: Yep. It’s very unclear what’s going to happen.

EK: You’ve proposed tying a short extension of the tax cuts to fundamental tax reform. How would that work, exactly?

KC: We’ve come up with several ideas. One would be to give Congress a certain amount of time, say 18 months, to come up with a reform plan. And then we could begin imposing reductions on tax expenditures across-the-board on some formula basis until something passes. Another possibility is that after whatever period of time you gave Congress to do tax reform, if it wasn’t done, you’d reimpose the Clinton-era rates on at least high-income people.

EK: In the coming months, Congress has multiple must-pass initiatives on the docket, including an extension of unemployment insurance and an increase in the debt ceiling. Is there any move toward tying the extension of the Bush tax cuts to action on those items, rather than letting each fight move forward on its own?

KC: That makes so much sense that it’s unlikely to happen. That’s in a way what the deficit commission was all about. Trying to put things together in a package so you didn’t face these things one at a time.

EK: If the issues aren’t grouped together, the likely outcome seems to be that we’ll blow a hole in the deficit and extend the tax cuts for people making more than $250,000, cut off unemployment benefits for 2 million Americans, and in a few months, Republicans will hammer Democrats for needing to raise the debt ceiling. Aren’t your colleagues concerned about all that?

KC: Well, I hope so. It’s pretty clear.

EK: As a member of the deficit commission, does the difference between the inevitability of extending deficit-increasing tax cuts and the cool reaction towards anything that would seriously reduce the deficit worry you?

KC: Here’s the lens through which I see it. Revenue is the lowest it’s been in 60 years as a share of our economy. Spending is the highest it’s been. That tells me you’ve got to work both sides of the equation. If you look at what the Domenici-Rivlin group will do, at what the Esquire group did, at what the deficit commission co-chairs put out, all of them recognize that you need to work on both sides of the equation. But there are those among us who don’t believe that revenue has any part in this. They don’t see revenue as creating deficits, they think it’s solely a spending issue. It’s an article of faith among them.

EK: But it seems that the dogmatism of the supply-side position has won out. You and many of your colleagues don’t subscribe to the idea that tax cuts are free, and you do worry about the deficit, and Democrats still control the Senate, but there’s not been any evident move to block the extension of the tax cuts unless they’re offset, much less stop them altogether. It seems that the strength of the commitment on the other side, wrongheaded as it may be as a matter of arithmetic, is overwhelming the Democrats, who can’t agree on what to do.

KC: Well, the final card has not been played here. I hope that doesn’t prove to be the case.

Photo credit: Melina Mara/Washington Post.

By Ezra Klein  | November 15, 2010; 5:50 PM ET
Categories:  Budget, Interviews  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Four possible deals on the Bush tax cuts
Next: Reconciliation

Comments

"Revenue is the lowest it’s been in 60 years as a share of our economy. Spending is the highest it’s been."
How disingenuous. The good senator might have mentioned that when 8 million people lose their incomes, of COURSE revenues will be down and spending up. Sheesh!

Posted by: sandicam | November 15, 2010 5:55 PM | Report abuse

If your unemployed you can still make a good amount of money online; here's how:

http://www.extraincome101.net


After becoming unemployed myself, I looked for other ways to make money;
that is how I found this information, so check it out.

Posted by: quisqueyo1 | November 15, 2010 7:57 PM | Report abuse

Good questions Ezra.

Sadly, the answers inspire zero confidence.

Posted by: Hopeful9 | November 15, 2010 10:22 PM | Report abuse

This sounds like an instant replay of the SGR formula for Medicare that worked so well. Don't worry so much. Ben is printing money even faster than we can spend it.

Posted by: 54465446 | November 15, 2010 10:32 PM | Report abuse

"Well, the final card has not been played here. I hope that doesn’t prove to be the case."

Call Sen. Conrad each time:
- Bush Tax Cuts for Rich are passed
- Unemployment allowance is not renewed and
- GOP gives new another blow to economic sense while negotiating debt ceiling.

In each case, publish those responses in BOLD FACE on your blog, even if in all 3 cases his office would have no comments (which is what will be).

Democrats are Neville Chamberlain of today - when GOP is taking down America's Fiscal Foundation (whatever is left off); these Dems are party to that. President Obama is equally culprit in all this mess by not doing what is good for America for the fear of Political attacks from GOP and his lust for his second term, no matter who ineffective that will be; assuming Americans accept such a spineless person as the leader second time.

Posted by: umesh409 | November 15, 2010 11:43 PM | Report abuse

Lost in all the noise is that if nothing is done with the estate tax, draconian increases go into effect on January 1st as well.

Just let the things expire already, and early next year propose lower rates below half-a-million or some such thing. This really is much ado about nothing.

But I'm reassured that this too shall pass. Seems like only yesterday the most important thing in all the world was the Ground Zero Mosque -- which wasn't a Mosque, and wasn't at Ground Zero.

Posted by: Hieronymous | November 16, 2010 9:59 AM | Report abuse

austerity and trickle down ... let's all say thank you ...
good lord.
what did George Carlin say about being bent over and a red white and blue errrrr ....

Posted by: AmericanSpirit | November 16, 2010 3:26 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company