Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:32 AM ET, 01/20/2011

Tom Toles is worth a thousand words

By Ezra Klein

c_01202011.gif

By Ezra Klein  | January 20, 2011; 10:32 AM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Darrell Issa: Sonic terrorist
Next: Kent Conrad to retire

Comments

HA! Or a Senate Committee Chairman...

Posted by: RisingTideLiftsAllBoats | January 20, 2011 10:40 AM | Report abuse

Great illustration!

As one who voted for President Obama, I'm relieved to see him being a bit bolder (and a bit more plainspoken) when it comes to reduction of the size of the federal regulatory beast: it's rare to see agreement on any point, so I welcome the agreement that many regulations are simply foolish and unnecessarily invasive. I'm not at all surprised, though, to hear the EPA and other errant bureaucratic agencies to declare themselves exempt from the President's order; in fact, such agency obstructionism offers an excellent opportunity for President Obama to demonstrate his leadership and command ability.

The comment above -- "or a Senate Committee Chairman" -- is also spot-on: during the 112th Congress, it's likely that the last remaining supporters of big government -- the Buffalo -- will be found in the Senate rather than the House, Judicial Branch, or Executive Branch. This will likely be the undoing of some Senators... and it's not a purely partisan issue: like many of his peers, Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, seems to shares the President's new embrace of smaller, more agile, less invasive federal government while many other Democrats and Republicans continue to advocate unwanted federal expansion.

When the Senate finally reconvenes to complete its first day on the job, we'll get a chance to see if Senate Democrats (in particular) and Republicans really mean what they said during their campaigns. For example, one of the three matters pending before the Senate is a rules change which requires advance notice of intent to object. Will Senator Reid, for example, obey this proposed new rule when considering HR 2? What about the many other bills that the House has already transmitted? Do Senators really want a more agile Senate, able to take a readily transparent up-or-down vote on every matter received from the House? Or do Senators prefer clinging to the power to obstruct and to over-regulate? We'll soon see!

Posted by: rmgregory | January 20, 2011 11:32 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company