Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 3:17 PM ET, 02/17/2011

A deal based on the Fiscal Commission would include higher taxes

By Ezra Klein

fiscalcomtable.jpg

There's a bit of talk about the Warner/Chambliss/Durbin/Crapo/Coburn/Conrad effort to make legislation out of the Fiscal Commission's final report. Jon Chait and Steve Benen are annoyed, however, to read in Jonathan Weissman's article that "the deficit commission's version of tax reform would net $180 billion in additional revenues over 10 years." Chait notes that $180 billion would mean there's "nearly ten times as much spending cuts ($1.7 trillion) as higher revenue ($180 billion.) ... It's so nuts I'm tempted to assume this story couldn't possibly be correct."

At least as far as the Fiscal Commission's report goes, Chait is right and the number is incorrect. "Weisman said that the Fiscal Commission got $180 billion in tax revenue relative to the baseline over ten years," one of the commission's staff members told me. "That's wrong. The tax reform piece brought in $180 billion in 2020 alone, and $785 billion over ten years." You can see that in the table atop this post, which comes from the report.

I guess it's possible that the senators themselves have decided to edit the Fiscal Commission's report so it includes $600 billion less in tax revenue, but no one I've spoken to in those offices seems to think that's happened. So I'll try to get a firmer statement on this in one direction or the other and report back. But for now, my understanding is that the idea is to make the Fiscal Commission's report into legislation, not radically change its mix of revenues and spending cuts, and so I'd assume they're still targeting $785 billion.

But one thing to note: The baseline the Fiscal Commission was using assumed the expiration of the high-income tax cuts. So the way to think of the tax increases they recommended was that first the Bush tax cuts for income over $250,000 would expire, and then you would reform the tax code and add $785 billion in revenues. In a world where none of the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, the $785 billion doesn't get revenues anywhere near where the Fiscal Commission's report said they should be.

By Ezra Klein  | February 17, 2011; 3:17 PM ET
Categories:  Budget  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Lunch break
Next: A good moment for a grand bargain?

Comments

First, presumably you are referring to the Simpson-Bowles report that was a proposed Fiscal Commission report. There is no Commission report and you should not suggest otherwise.

Second, Warner et al are not going to propose the tax restructuring that Simpson-Bowles proposed. They will cherry-pick from the proposed report, based on their political leanings. It will be a interesting exercise only insofar as it reveals their priorities at this time.

Posted by: pjro | February 17, 2011 4:01 PM | Report abuse

According to the chart, the Fiscal Commission proposal raises $223 ($180 + $43) in 2020 and $995 billion ($780+$210) through 2020. More importantly, revenue increases to 20.6% of GDP, almost identical to the level achieved if all the Bush tax cuts and the tax expenditures that get extended every year were allowed to actually expire.

Posted by: ldavidadler | February 17, 2011 6:48 PM | Report abuse

Sorry, meant to write ($785+$210).

Posted by: ldavidadler | February 17, 2011 6:50 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company