Mubarak steps down
I have zero insight to offer on the remarkable events in Egypt. But I did find this essay to be helpful in trying to think through what's happening there, and who's playing what role. An excerpt:
Many international media commentators – and some academic and political analysts – are having a hard time understanding the complexity of forces driving and responding to these momentous events. This confusion is driven by the binary “good guys versus bad guys” lenses most use to view this uprising. Such perspectives obscure more than they illuminate. There are three prominent binary models out there and each one carries its own baggage: (1) People versus Dictatorship: This perspective leads to liberal naïveté and confusion about the active role of military and elites in this uprising. (2) Seculars versus Islamists: This model leads to a 1980s-style call for “stability” and Islamophobic fears about the containment of the supposedly extremist “Arab street.” Or, (3) Old Guard versus Frustrated Youth: This lens imposes a 1960s-style romance on the protests but cannot begin to explain the structural and institutional dynamics driving the uprising, nor account for the key roles played by many 70-year-old Nasser-era figures.
To map out a more comprehensive view, it may be helpful to identify the moving parts within the military and police institutions of the security state and how clashes within and between these coercive institutions relate to shifting class hierarchies and capital formations.
As they say, read the whole thing.
Posted by: johnmarshall5446 | February 11, 2011 12:23 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: tuber | February 11, 2011 1:18 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: jkaren | February 11, 2011 4:45 PM | Report abuse