Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

The Web Looks Back on Apollo 11

One of the privileges of this job is the chance to see things once confined to science fiction become fact. A pocket-sized device that carries all the music you own? A display in your car that shows your location and what roads to take to your destination? A television thin enough to hang on the wall? All of these once-implausible things are now everyday items.

Forty years ago today, we saw a different sort of science fiction transformed into fact when the first humans landed on the moon. You could mark this occasion in any number of ways--visit the Air and Space Museum, re-read any of the numerous books published on the subject, or look up at the moon tonight and contemplate the distance of that journey--but if you're reading this, the Web has a few sites worth your attention.

You could start with We Choose The Moon, a project of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum and AOL that recreates Apollo 11's mission, minute by minute, with a mix of audio recordings, text, photos and videos. It reminds me of the interactive, multimedia-soaked "coffee-table CD-ROMs" that, back in the late 1990s, looked to be a new artistic medium until the CD-ROM business went bust.

For its part, NASA has gone back and had its copies of the lunar-landing TV footage cleaned up (the original recordings, sadly, were lost years ago). The newly restored clips don't quite live up to their "HD" labeling, but they reveal far more subtlety and detail than the blurry footage you're used to seeing. NASA has also prepared an interactive panorama of the view at Tranquility Base, and at yet another page on the space agency's site you can see newly-taken photos of five of the six Apollo landing sites.

And just this morning, Google added a new "Moon in Google Earth" module to its Google Earth program. This combines an interactive, 3-D map of the moon with numerous links to historical documents and photos, interactive panoramas and guided tours covering each Apollo mission's work on the moon.

These projects represent some fascinating multimedia work--light-years more advanced than the blurry, black-and-white TV coverage of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's first steps. And yet there is a painful irony here: While we have far better tools to portray these missions than we did in 1969, we can't repeat them. So many other kinds of technology have seen upgrade after upgrade over the past four decades, but since 1972 nobody has even gone beyond low Earth orbit, much less back to the moon. Why do you think that's so?

By Rob Pegoraro  |  July 20, 2009; 3:16 PM ET
Categories:  Digital culture  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Personal-Finance Apps Fade On Disk, Flourish On the Web
Next: PostPoints tip: Shorten Web addresses wisely

Comments

NASA's using Microsoft Moon?
Bada-bing!

Posted by: jimward21 | July 20, 2009 3:54 PM | Report abuse

Bringing the show back to planet Earth for just a minute

HOW does one get Washington DC Channel 7 on their new TV convert system?

I have heard that Ch 7 did not change actual transmitting frequencies like the others did and that is the problem, but who knows -- the old channel 7 isn't working on my regular TV but that might also make sense since the mode of transmission has changed.

I know numerous folks that also can't get channel 7 on their new converter boxes

Abrakadabra -- any suggestions to my e-mail welcome ESPECIALLY FROM CHANNEL 7.

Posted by: brucerealtor@gmail.com | July 21, 2009 3:15 AM | Report abuse

OK you got me -- I Can't see Channel 7's tower from my DC Office, like Tina Fey said Palin could see Russia from her house.

And I actually thought Palin said that -- hey they look alike, right and the Press FAILED to comment on Biden's COMPLETE REWRITE of American History in that debate -- including His portions of it.

Posted by: brucerealtor@gmail.com | July 21, 2009 3:23 AM | Report abuse

Regarding Ch 7, I was finally able to pick it up after an hour of fiddling with my dipole antennas. However I still can't reliably pick up ch 9, signal strength keeps fluctuating between 0%-50%

Posted by: crazer | July 21, 2009 2:06 PM | Report abuse

Crazer

Thanks. So then, apparently its an antenna issue alone.

Out comes the old 'long wire' antenna in that case.

Bruce

Posted by: brucerealtor@gmail.com | July 22, 2009 10:43 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company