Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 10:00 AM ET, 02/15/2011

Google adds content-farm blocking extension to Chrome

By Rob Pegoraro

You can do your part to salt the earth of content farms--mass-production sites that extrude content to fit popular search terms, as opposed to starting out with something original to say--with a new extension to Google's Chrome browser.

Called Personal Blocklist, it's a free, one-click installation in Chrome. Google introduced it yesterday afternoon in a blog post by search engineer Matt Cutts.

chrome_content_farm_extension.png

Personal Blocklist, as you can see in the picture at right, lets you click a small link below each search result to remove a site from future searches in that installation of Chrome. Blocked sites appear only momentarily in results before getting whisked out of sight by the extension, which also adds a message that "Some results were removed by the Personal Blocklist Chrome extension" to the bottom of the page.

You can uncover blocked results by clicking a "show" link next to that message or by clicking a red icon, with a hand facing outwards in a "stop" gesture, in Chrome's toolbar.

You can't, however, see if other people have blocked a site. Nor does this affect search results done in other browsers or in other copies of Chrome, even if you're signed into a Google account; in that respect, it's less useful than SearchWiki, the feature that allowed Google users to vote sites up or down from late 2008 until early 2010.

But Personal Blocklist could have bigger changes later on. In yesterday's post, Cutts notes that Google will be observing your use of the extension:

If installed, the extension also sends blocked site information to Google, and we will study the resulting feedback and explore using it as a potential ranking signal for our search results.

That could cause trouble down the line for content farms, which have been a growing problem for Google (as noted by my colleague Mike Rosenwald in a recent Sunday Business feature and by me in an accompanying column). As I wrote in that piece, sites like Demand Media's eHow and Yahoo's Associated Content game Google's system by analyzing popular search trends, then ordering up articles and videos--commissioned on the cheap, often with little attention to their quality--to match those queries. The practice turns one SEO, search engine optimization, into another: search engine obsession.

That practice pollutes Google results with pages that appear relevant but prove uninformative. It also tempts other sites to follow suit. Consider, for example, The Huffington Post's "What time does the Superbowl start?" post, obviously cranked out to pair up with a popular Google query.

But you can't say content farming doesn't pay. Demand Media fetched $1.9 billion in its initial public offering, and the Huffington Post's aptitude for SEO-driven programming--much more so than its stable of A-list bloggers or its original reporting--explains why AOL is paying $315 million for the site.

If those trends bother you, you might want to try Personal Blocklist. Or you might want to try a different search engine. Will you choose either of those options? Will you continue to look past content-farm clutter in your Web searches? Or do you not mind so-called content farms in the first place?

By Rob Pegoraro  | February 15, 2011; 10:00 AM ET
Categories:  Search  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Rumors say iPhone 5 may have 4-inch screen, sliding keyboard
Next: Apple app store to offer subscriptions

Comments

The real problem isn't junk domains; it's junk pages at legitimate domains. For example, Demand Media now supplies "Travel Tips" fillers to USAToday.com. Is the typical searcher going to block all USAToday.com search results just to avoid the empty calories that USA TODAY is buying from a content farm?

Posted by: Durant_Imboden | February 15, 2011 2:55 PM | Report abuse

It is really very surprising to know that people really follow Social Media network to follow a brand. we are also in online trade for last few months and observed that people are coming to us through online classified ads sites and social networking sites but didn’t realize that we could get more satisfied clients form most of social networking sites with a bit more effort and with offering some special that they will get fine for themselves or for there loved once. Really a worthy post you have delivered.
http://www.seoservicess.com/

Posted by: SarahSEO | February 16, 2011 2:46 AM | Report abuse

Not sure if you read ReadWriteWeb but they posted an article yesterday about a new browser extension that does the same thing as Cutt's extension but across Chrome, Firefox and Internet Explorer, and across the Google, Yahoo and Ping search engines. The Google extension only worked with Chrome.

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/nevermind_google_new_extensions_block_spam_across.php

The new extension came from Utah developer Ed Orcutt of within 12 hours of Google's announcement, part of a $500 contest from app dev platform provider Kynetx.

Posted by: kwanlass | February 16, 2011 8:28 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company