Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:17 PM ET, 03/11/2011

Japan: Earthquake shows how bad news travels fast, and first, online

By Rob Pegoraro

My introduction to the awful news about the earthquake in Japan came not from the radio or the Web, but from my phone. As I often do, I woke it up a few minutes after doing the same myself, glanced at my e-mail and then flipped over to the phone's Twitter app.

Then I quickly began reading dozens of updates about a stunning, unexpected event. The first ones had arrived at about 1:30 in the morning EST via tweets from nonstop tech blogger Robert Scoble, who was passing on some tweets from Japan: "7.9 earthquake strikes northern Japan ... tsunami warning issued" and "wow, that was a crazy earthquake... ran out of the building. 7.9 at epicenter.."

Other tweets and retweets noted the increasing disaster and linked to photos and videos already being uploaded while critiquing news coverage. Among international news networks, the BBC and Al-Jazeera English won more compliments on Twitter than CNN for their initial responses.

But none of those had the same force as first-person observations such as "Terrible earthquake hit Japan. The skyscraper rocks slowly. So scared." or another witness's description of the quake as "hard enough to make me nauseous while sitting down."

There's much to be said about the virtues of a communications service that lets you publish to the world from any phone that can send a text message. (Media critic Jeff Jarvis suggested Friday morning that Twitter users adopt a new symbol to identify first-hand accounts: an exclamation-point "witness tag" instead of the pound sign of its hashtags, such as "!jpquake.")

Since those first panicked tweets, the Web has been filling up with video clips that make clear exactly what an earthquake looks like as it happens (YouTube now has a page dedicated to them); Wikipedia has a growing and extensively hyperlinked article; and Google now tops search results with information about the quake and has set up a special page listing resources and collecting updates. And, not least, news organizations such as The Washington Post are doing their part to tell the story.

All of this represents an enormous upgrade over the options available the last time a quake this devastating hit Japan--the 1995 Kobe quake. I wrote a short piece for The Post then about the Internet's success in helping survivors relay first-hand accounts, and how that represented a new development in people's responses to disaster:

"At the center of the disruption, people at the Kobe City University of Foreign Studies have placed several pages about the disaster on the World Wide Web, the Net's warehouse of linked text, pictures and sounds." (Note the stilted language used to describe the Web to print readers--The Post itself didn't publish on the Web at the time.)

The tools we have to witness the news have greatly advanced from those available in 1995, and even since more recent tragedies such as the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the 2004 tsunami. We can tune in from afar and get all the sights and sounds we care to digest, and do so from just about anywhere with a wireless signal.

But one thing hasn't changed: After seeing and hearing all that, there's not much we can do if we're far away from a disaster but click a "donate" button and hope that people there are okay.

By Rob Pegoraro  | March 11, 2011; 1:17 PM ET
Categories:  Mobile  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Microsoft confirms "NoDo" delay
Next: Finding a new life for your old iPad

Comments

Posted by: wiredog | March 11, 2011 2:36 PM | Report abuse

That's an excellent point. Thanks, wiredog.

- RP

Posted by: robpegoraro | March 11, 2011 4:03 PM | Report abuse

I have a news app on my iPhone, set for auto notifications. It's at times annoying, but when I was woken at 4 AM this morning with news of the earthquake and tsunami, probably minutes after they struck Japan, I appreciated the immediacy of these alerts. It could come in handy if something happens closer to home.

Posted by: CafeBeouf | March 11, 2011 5:30 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company