Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Hubble Repair Mission Widens NASA Policy Rift

By Ed O'Keefe

Here's another great example of the headquarters vs. regional office dynamic, as reported by The Post's Joel Achenbach:

NASA's triumphant mission to repair the Hubble Space Telescope this week has cracked open a policy rift within the space agency, with a top NASA scientist saying that the United States is on the way to losing the capability of doing what it has just done so dramatically.

David Leckrone, the senior project scientist for the Hubble, said NASA's new strategy for the post-space shuttle era does not include servicing scientific instruments in space, and he fears that vast amounts of accumulated knowledge and technical expertise will quickly vanish.

" It just makes me want to cry to think that this is the end of it," Leckrone said at a news conference earlier this week. "There is no person out there, there is no leadership out there, there is no vision out there to pick up the baton that we're about to hand off, and carry it forward."

His words, streamed around the planet on the NASA website, drew sharp rebukes internally and some public rebuttals at agency headquarters. But Leckrone, who plans to retire in October, is not backing down, and Friday he reiterated his case.

"I feel like NASA's doing what it's done before -- it comes up with a great capability and, for political or budgetary reasons or whatever, it abandons it," Leckrone told The Post. He added, "I've been besieged by NASA people thanking me for saying what they think needed to be said."

The dispute has created a rift between Leckrone and the head of space science at NASA, Edward Weiler. The two scientists have devoted much of their long NASA careers to the Hubble -- they hugged after the successful shuttle launch last week in Florida -- but Weiler, from his perch at agency headquarters, has a dim view of sending astronauts to fix things in space. He said the cost is too high.

"Servicing was great on Hubble, but it cost a few bucks," Weiler said. "The Hubble program has cost about 10 billion dollars."

He said it might have been cheaper to launch three or four Hubbles rather than keep fixing and upgrading the one instrument. And he noted that none of the many scientific instruments currently in orbit, other than the Hubble, were designed to be serviced.

Continue reading this story >>>

By Ed O'Keefe  | May 22, 2009; 12:58 PM ET
Categories:  Agencies and Departments, Turf War  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Best Places to Work: HQ vs. Regional Offices
Next: Spotted: Kathleen Sebelius and Elmo

No comments have been posted to this entry.

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company