Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Eye Opener: Unions oppose OPM health-care role

By Ed O'Keefe

Eye Opener

Happy Friday! Two leading federal workers unions want lawmakers to keep their hands off the program that provides health-care coverage to federal employees, arguing that any potential merger with a larger public health care program would jeopardize health coverage for federal workers.

Senate Democrats may soon strike a deal to create a program establishing several national insurance policies administered by private companies but negotiated by the Office of Personnel Management. If private firms were unable to deliver acceptable national policies, a government plan would be created.

“OPM’s role as the government’s HR office is too important to dilute with the massive undertaking of creating and administering a new health care system for millions of Americans," said Margaret L. Baptiste, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE). “While NARFE supports access to comprehensive health care for all Americans, we are concerned that an OPM-administered health care system is being proposed as a political solution to a legitimate national problem.”

Baptiste suggested a program modeled on FEHBP should instead be operated by the Department of Health and Human Services, since "one of their fundamental responsibilities is to administer large health care systems for diverse communities of coverage."

Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), expressed similar concerns, telling lawmakers in a letter that her union supports "the continued integrity of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).”

“Any merging -- or opening up -- of FEHBP now or in the future to additional groups of enrollees would amount to one employer-sponsored plan essentially subsidizing other groups of employees,” Kelley said. “NTEU would oppose opening up FEHBP to additional groups without separate risk pools.”

Kelley's concerns are unfounded, since the current proposals would create a separate program for eligible Americans while FEHBP would continue in its current form. Baptiste however raises stronger, legitimate concerns about expanding the size and scope of OPM beyond its capacity to effectively focus on federal employment matters.

The two unions could apply little effective political pressure on lawmakers, since the only politicians they could legitimately pressure are in federal worker-rich Maryland, Virginia and D.C. The Democratic senators and representatives from those are all mostly reliable votes in favor of health-care reform.

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below

In other news...

Big Government Story of the Day: Blackwater guards tied to covert raids by the CIA: Several former company guards said that their involvement in the operations became so routine that the lines supposedly dividing the the agency, the military and the company became blurred.

More Obama Nominees Announced: On Thursday the president tapped Sharon E. Burke to serve as the Pentagon's director of operational energy plans and program; Marilyn A. Brown to serve as a member of the board of directors on the Tennessee Valley Authority; and William C. Ostendorff to serve as commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Track all of Obama's nominees with The Post's Head Count and WhoRunsGov.

Cabinet and Staff News: The Iraqi prime minister snubs and reschedules Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will serve lunch to lawmakers next week. In Copenhagen, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says Bush "slept" through climate change. (Commerce Secretary Gary Locke is in Copenhagen today.) U.S. envoy to North Korea Stephen Bosworth said his journey to Pyongyang produced no commitment that the North would return to international talks. NSC adviser Samantha Power had a hand in Obama's Nobel speech. A new ambassador could soon be on the road to Damascus. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) blocking North Carolina U.S. attorney nominee until the current U.S. attorney completes investigations of Gov. Mike Easley (D) and former presidential candidate John Edwards.

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION:
H1N1 death rate is elevated for Indians, Alaska natives:
The cause of this difference in mortality is not known. CDC Director Thomas R. Frieden told reporters that the findings are more likely "a reflection of environmental factors and underlying conditions."

DEFENSE DEPARTMENT:
Defense Dept. in contempt of court for failing to videotape detainee testimony: A judge had ordered the government to videotape Mohammed Al-Adahi when he testified June 23 via a secure video link from the prison in Cuba to her courtroom in Washington.

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION:
Crash victims' group assails White House stance on airline safety: A family group said the agency's director is standing in the way of legislation that would mandate higher flight-time requirements for airline pilots.

TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT:
GAO finds confusion among recipients of stimulus transportation funds: Recipients of transportation and infrastructure contracts and grants were confused about how to count the number of jobs saved or created by federal stimulus funds.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT:
Joblessness plan revamps rules on bank bailouts: The Obama administration is developing a major initiative to tackle the economic and political problem of unemployment by getting federal bailout funds into the hands of small businesses.

Follow The Federal Eye on Twitter | Submit your news tips here

By Ed O'Keefe  | December 11, 2009; 6:00 AM ET
Categories:  Eye Opener, Health Care  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Agencies encouraged to donate their leftovers
Next: Where's the TSA administrator?

Comments

I am a government employee and a union member. I don't see the risk nor do I see the point in hoarding resources. We are already over taxing the system. We need to find a way to work together. We can be effecient when we want to be and there political will to be.

Posted by: ncwilson | December 11, 2009 10:18 AM | Report abuse

It seems like everyone who has good health care wants to make sure no one else can get it. I'm beginning to feel like it's all a game of dodge ball and those of us who need insurance are the ball, being tossed to each potential source and then tossed to the next.

Posted by: andreams | December 11, 2009 11:36 AM | Report abuse

When will Labor wake up and realize that the pending bills are replete with anti-union provisions - bargaining leeway is taken away, individual members can opt out, bargained plans cannot opt in. Excise taxes are the least of the worries.

Posted by: mleblanc6 | December 12, 2009 8:45 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company