Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Chat With The Eye!: Sen. Bunning, Post Office, Rahm Emanuel

By Ed O'Keefe

Highlights of Tuesday's Post Politics Hour, a chat dominated by the U.S. Postal Service's grim news and Sen. Jim Bunning's continued opposition to an unemployment benefits bill:

Politics Hour

Post office customer in Rockville: John E. Potter (Postmaster General of the United States) seems to be in the process of asking for a lot more federal money while defending his agency which is expected to lose $238 billion in the next 10 years. Other businesses have survived when there was a business downturn. Why can't the post office? Are we dealing with another bloated government agency? Companies go out of business when they can't compete.

Ed O'Keefe: One big misconception that we're going to kill early in this chat: The Postal Service is NOT seeking a government bailout and is not seeking subsidies for the universal service it provides.

It does have a $15 billion debt limit with the U.S. treasury. By September the mail agency anticipates being just $1.8 billion shy of that limit.

But Potter made it infinitely clear during a briefing for reporters on Monday that he doesn't want USPS to seek taxpayer assistance, because of the current economic climate, the obvious impact it would make on the treasury and the fact that they believe they can go it alone.


Make up your mind: So the Post and other media outlets have been running dozens of stories stating that Rahm Emanuel has too much influence in the White House and is screwing up things.

Now we got a story that says he's not influential enough!

At some point, stuff like this makes the Post look like it's more interested in filling space than it is in accurately reporting the truth.

So what is the truth?

Ed O'Keefe: The truth is in the eye of the beholder on this one and Washington isn't sure what to make of Rahm Emanuel: Maybe he's good for President Obama, maybe he's bad. So at this point, we've presented both arguments.


Bristow, Va.: Five day mail delivery, like term limits for Congress, should have been imposed forty years ago. The energy alone that is saved (oil and wind), justifies it.

Ed O'Keefe: And national polling backs you up, Bristow. Potter seems to believe he'll get Congress to give him five days of delivery and maybe a few other items. Stay tuned.

Interestingly -- the one thing customers really don't want is the Postal Service to stop delivering mail directly to them. They explored possibly setting up "clusterboxes" in neighborhoods that would house everyone's mail box in one location (which is done in newer subdivisions). But polling and customer surveys showed folks didn't like that idea, so USPS backed off those plans.


Greenbelt, Md.: Is there a requirement that the USPS has to have a post office within each ZIP code? What are the requirements for that post office? Could the Postal Service sell off some of its properties and provide basic postal services out of a much smaller storefront?

(I'm not sure what other people would do with some of those post offices, though. The post office in Sunspot, New Mexico, is only as big as an outhouse.)

Ed O'Keefe: Yes -- by law, every zip code must have a post office. That's why military bases and even the White House have one, because they have their own Zip code.

The plans call for keeping those offices in each Zip, but then close down and consolidate other locations and eventually provide some services and products in grocery stores, pharmacies, coffee shops and office supply stores.


Cool Kids: Hey, kids today want to be cool, just like President Obama, so they want to take up smoking. Think that might get Barack Obama to stop smoking?

Ed O'Keefe: Yes -- The White House has been very careful to address this issue. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said on Monday that the president chews nicotine gum but occasionally slides and smokes. He gets asked about it in interviews and gets defensive.

The big challenge or question is: Will we ever see a photo of President Obama smoking?

Read the full chat here and leave your thoughts in the comments section below

By Ed O'Keefe  | March 2, 2010; 12:00 PM ET
Categories:  About the Blog  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: The Postal Service's grim route forward
Next: Scott Brown named to Senate government affairs panel


To Senator Bunning, the repukes, & blue dog democraps: Time to Demand every elected official to give up their public health care coverage!!!!!!

To Each and every republican and democratic elected official (senator, member of congress, governor, republican party member AND their staff members AND ALL their family members) who are AGAINST or has voted against or is campaigning or speaking against the Health Care Reform Bills or any Publicly Funded Healthcare Options:

Will you give up your public funded healthcare insurance and benefits now and forever starting TODAY?

And will you and your staff and family members only seek PRIVATE individual/family policies with the type of coverage available only in your state by private free market insurance companies that are approved for and at the same rates to available for members of and by your state, not through a trade association or business or any other type of coverage provided by a friend, crony or associate?

Will you promise not to accept discounted health care policies or discounts or special deals from any of your contributors or supporters or other private or public entity?

So WaPo: Why don't you and every media organization start asking them these questions of these hypocritical, self-important, self-enriching, America hating scumbag politicians?

Start a 'truth' database that focuses on each and every publicy elected official who opposes health care reform AND/OR publicly funded health care?

Make them put their money where their hypocritical loudmouths are. Isn't the fourth estate supposed to protect the public from these consummate practicers of mendacity?

Posted by: flacan | March 2, 2010 1:21 PM | Report abuse

What is the deal with all of this last minute legislation? If the funding is so important why wasn't this passed six months or a year ago?

Obama won't lead.
Congress Can't.

Posted by: member5 | March 2, 2010 1:40 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company