Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Another look at federal workers' pay

By Multiplatform Editor

By The Post's Federal Diary columnist Joe Davidson:

Federal employees should brace for another round, or perhaps it's a continuing wave, of hits on their pay.

The CATO Institute has released its latest in what has become a series of reports about "Overpaid Federal Workers," as the current installment is titled. It says:

The federal workforce has become an elite island of secure and high-paid workers, separated from the ocean of average American workers competing in the global economy. It is time for some restraint. Federal wages should be frozen or cut, overly generous federal benefits should be overhauled, and the federal workforce downsized through program terminations and privatization. It is unfair to ask taxpayers to foot an ever-increasing bill for federal workers, especially when private-sector compensation has not kept pace.

Yet, as the article by Chris Edwards notes, the Federal Salary Council has determined that, on average, federal workers were paid 26.4 percent less than their private-sector counterparts in 2009. Edwards declares that information to be "non-transparent," "subject to a large amount of statistical modeling" and "suspicious."

President Obama's fiscal 2011 budget proposal, released in February, supported the pay of federal workers, based on their age and educational levels. Twenty percent of federal employees have a graduate degree, just 13 percent in the private sector do, according to data in the budget documents. More than half of federal employees have a college degree, compared with about a third, 35 percent, in the private sector.

And, the older you get, the more likely it is that your income will rise, at least to a point. Forty-six percent of federal workers are 50 or older, compared with 31 percent of those in private sector. Also, when comparing the federal government and the private sector, it's worth remembering that Uncle Sam employs relatively few minimum-wage workers.

Patricia Niehaus, president of the Federal Managers Association, said the CATO article will lead to "more fed-bashing."

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

By Multiplatform Editor  | June 8, 2010; 1:00 PM ET
Categories:  Workplace Issues  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Pentagon once again nixes Navy name change
Next: Orszag: Government can improve efficiency with technology upgrade

Comments

More political propaganda from Cato, a pseudo intellectual mouthpiece of right wing conservative propaganda that also advocates elimination of federal funding for public broadcasting, i.e., broadcasting that cannot be bought and controlled by the affluent people and companies that already own and manipulate every major public broadcasting corporation. Cato exists because you can fool some of the people all of the time. But Cato fails again, and will always fail in the long run, because you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Some federal workers are overpaid, like many non-federal workers (let's see, how about some banking industry executives for starters, and maybe some Cato employees too). Yes, something must be done about these problems. So what about limiting ludicrous bonuses for the executives of public companies driven into the ground by bad decision making (does the financial collapse on Wall Street ring a bell?). And after that, well, you get the picture!

Posted by: ccraigmorris | June 8, 2010 7:29 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company