Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Log Cabin Republicans explain 'don't ask' suit

By Ed O'Keefe

A federal court in California began hearing arguments this week in a case filed by the Log Cabin Republicans, who are challenging the constitutionality of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy banning gays and lesbians from openly serving in uniform.

The group started in the late 1970s as a Republican equal rights organization, with a special emphasis on gays and lesbians. Members must be registered Republicans, but are not required to be gay or lesbian.

R. Clarke Cooper has served as LCR executive director since May. A former Bush administration State Department official, he’s also a Captain with the U.S. Army Reserves. He spoke Wednesday with Federal Eye about the case and Republican opinions on gay rights.

Why has Log Cabin Republicans fought for six years to end “don’t ask, don’t tell”?
It’s to directly challenge the constitutionality of the policy. We’re seeking a ruling from the federal court that the policy violates constitutional protections of due process and freedom of speech. ...

If [the policy] ends through the executive process, fine, if it ends through the legislative process, fine. But to achieve victory, as in military operations, one has to look at multiple theaters. Our full coverage approach has been to cover every aspect of terrain: There’s the consultative process in the Executive Branch by communicating with the Defense Department. There’s the legislative process, advocating for the Congress to get out of the personnel management business and strike “don’t ask, don’t tell” from the U.S. Code so that the Defense Department can actually implement open service. Then there’s the judicial approach.

We’ve gotten some slings and arrows from Democrats, who say, ‘Isn’t it convenient that you’re going to court right now and holding the administration accountable.’ We’re going to hold the administration’s feet to the fire, but you know as well as I do that you can’t walk up to a judge and ask him when to set the trial. We’ve been working up to this court date, it didn’t happen overnight.

From libertarians, to moderates, to the most socially conservative members, what do Republicans generally say about your efforts?
There’s been a steady increase of Americans in support of repeal. If you break down those metrics, registered Republicans generally support repeal. There are those who are self-identified conservatives, who can range from libertarians to Tea Party members, who are, again, for repeal. Then there are...people who attend church services on a regular basis. Again, there’s a steady support for repeal.

But some members of Congress have a different view. ... For others, it’s the fiscal side. ... There’s a lot of support data out there that Log Cabin and other organizations have used to show it’s expensive to discharge somebody. You get someone who is either a commissioned officer or as an E-1 enlisted, it costs a lot of money to put them through basic training. Then if they go through additional schooling, that’s additional funds. Then if they’re discharged, they don’t get a pink slip and leave the next day, there’s a whole drawn out period of time, from when they find out to when they take off the uniform. So there’s that negative impact.

Considering the growing support for gay rights, do you see Republicans dropping gay rights as an issue of concern?
Both parties, just like corporate entities, look at polling data. It shows that Republcians are concerned about jobs, and everybody needs jobs regardless of orientation. Many are concerned about spending, that’s nothing new. Many are concerned about the health-care process. So there are other issues to coalesce around. ...

Our monicker is “Inclusion Wins.” We’ve been advocating for years that we should focus on basic, core conservative values and stay away from devisive wedge issues and social sisues. So I believe that the party, and many in the party, see that wedge issues have a diminishing return and that they’re not a winning proposition.

The Pentagon sent 400,000 active duty and reserve troops a survey last week about repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell.” Should troops complete the survey?
Yes, and I’ve been telling them that. I’m going to participate. There’s an online dropbox and I’m going to log on and participate and do that.

So as a reserve Army Captain who is gay, you’re not worried about being discharged under the policy?
The threat and specter is still there, but this is a policy that needs to go. Do I want to be discharged? Heck no, I love the Army, I’m proud of my service. Some of my best friends are either active or reservists. My family has been serving in the military in some fashion since the 1630s, in what was once home guard, later national guard, reserve and active duty. Every generation has been doing military service, and I don’t plan to resign my commission, there’s no need to.

But resigning versus being forced out is another thing.
Well, that’s not necessary either.

So you don’t have concerns about safeguarding the privacy of troops that participate in the survey like other gay rights groups do?
My concern is that if people who are directly affected by this policy don’t participate in the survey, then we’re abdicating terrain. It’s not a good idea to surrender in that sense.

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below

By Ed O'Keefe  | July 14, 2010; 3:13 PM ET
Categories:  Military  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Well-fed feds
Next: House approves telework bill

Comments

'Don't ask' has to go. There is not one sane reason why gay people in the military are a problem. Most people won't care, the dead enders will have to walk it off.

Posted by: thelaw1 | July 14, 2010 6:32 PM | Report abuse

5-10% of males are homosexual. They've been in the military since forever. They eat, drink, shower, sleep and fight next to heterosexual males and have done so since time forever.

The problem is misguided religious whackos. THEY should be kept out of the military because they believe in strange fantasies about spirits and voices.

Posted by: thebobbob | July 14, 2010 7:20 PM | Report abuse

Don't we want the misguided whackos to have the opportunity to be cannon fodder?

Posted by: jiji1 | July 15, 2010 4:43 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company