Dozens of ex-postal officials got generous no-bid deals, report says
Who says you can't go back? Apparently you can at the U.S. Postal Service.
Dozens of former top executives and hundreds of former employees have returned to the agency in recent years as private contractors, sometimes making double the salaries they made as full-time workers, according to a new watchdog report.
Three audits released this week said the cash-strapped Postal Service is doing a poor job tracking its use of no-bid contracts, contributes more to worker health and life insurance benefits than other federal agencies and should consider closing more of its regional offices to help address an anticipated $230 billion, 10-year budget gap.
The three reports come as the Postal Service is set to report billions of dollars in losses Wednesday because of declining mail volume, awaits permission from postal regulators to raise postage rates and is locked in negotiations with two of its largest unions.
The Postal Service has awarded more than 2,700 contracts to former employees since 1991 and awarded 17 no-bid deals to former executives between 2006 and 2009, according to one of the reports. Most of those executives made six-figure sums, the report said. One unnamed executive received a $260,000 no-bid deal in July 2009 to train his successor just two months after retiring.
"It appears unethical to hire back former executives at nearly twice their former pay to advise new executives who were placed in their position based on their expertise and years of Postal Service experience," the report said. "There is also employee morale and public image issues management must consider when the Postal Service is closing post offices and seeking a reduced delivery schedule."
Beyond employment contracts, the Postal Service improperly classified the status of 5 percent, or $910 million of its $18 billion annual contracting costs, according to the report.
"The Postal Service, like the federal sector and private industry, will use noncompetitive purchases in those instances when a noncompetitive purchase is the best contracting method to meet our business needs," Postal Service spokeswoman Joanne Veto said. The mail agency is also reviewing its deals with former employees and has instituted new policies to guard against potential conflicts of interest, Veto said.
The federal government procures about 30 percent of its goods and services, and the Postal Service has stringent approval requirements for noncompetitive purchases, she said.
A separate report detailed the Postal Service's contributions to worker health care and life insurance benefits. The mail agency's contribution rate to the Federal Employees Health Benefits program is 79 percent for most postal workers, higher than the 72 percent contribution rate the federal government pays for civilian workers. Postal officials involved in ongoing labor negotiations hope to win concessions from labor unions to reduce that contribution rate in coming years.
But postal auditors told the office of Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) Friday that the Postal Service pays 100 percent of health benefits for senior executives, some administrative staffers and directors of its office of inspector general.
A third report published this week presented plans to save $289 million to $894 million in the next decade by merging or closing dozens of administrative offices. Auditors recommended either merging several nearby offices into a central location, closing district offices with low work hours and mail volume, or moving regional offices into its Washington headquarters.
USPS has trimmed $10 billion in costs since 2008, and this year ceased hiring and promoting administrative staff. But Collins and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) plan to use the audits to urge an additional $800 million in cuts in fiscal 2011.
Aides said the senators requested the reports after auditors revealed this year that former postal executive Robert F. Bernstock had awarded millions of dollars in noncompetitive employment contracts to former colleagues. Bernstock left the Postal Service in May before auditors issued their report.
Collins called on Postmaster General John E. Potter to immediately consider the recommendations from the three reports.
"These IG reports raise extremely troubling questions about the management abilities and core decisions of the Postal Service," Collins said, adding that the mail agency "is at a crossroads in its history. The survival of this institution, which is vital to our country, depends on its regaining its financial footing."
The Maine Republican opposes a Senate bill unveiled Thursday that would give the Postal Service more flexibility to cut Saturday mail deliveries and close thousands of post offices. She also opposes plans to raise first-class stamp prices to 46 cents in January. The Postal Regulatory Commission must issue a binding decision on the rate increase by Oct. 4.
Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.
| September 24, 2010; 3:44 PM ET
Categories: Oversight, Postal Service
Save & Share: Previous: Longest-serving federal prosecutor in history retires
Next: Presidential transition bill passes the Senate
Posted by: jsantana1 | September 24, 2010 5:51 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Solidarity70 | September 25, 2010 8:37 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Tindad | September 26, 2010 3:50 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: mycroftt | September 27, 2010 8:15 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: lynnc412 | September 28, 2010 7:13 AM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.