Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Kaufman warns of federal workers' 'pent up demand' to retire

By Ed O'Keefe

Outgoing Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.) warned Wednesday that lawmakers need to act soon to address a delayed, but impending government brain drain as tens of thousands of experienced federal workers prepare to retire in the coming years as the economy improves.

Ted Kaufman
Sen. Ted Kaufman. (Post)

Kaufman has served as the temporary successor to Vice President Joe Biden since last year after previously serving as his chief of staff. Kaufman gave 100 Senate floor speeches touting the work of rank and file federal workers and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) has promised to continue the tradition.

Kaufman spent much of his Senate tenure focused on fiscal issues, financial regulatory reform and spoke Wednesday about his work on federal personnel issues:

You've focused primarily on financial reform, taxes, health-care and federal worker issues. Have you seen meaningful policy change in the last 18 months regarding the federal workforce?
When you look at what this administration has had to deal with, what this Congress has had to deal with, we've passed more legislation than any Congress since FDR: War in Iraq, War in Afghanistan, two Supreme Court nominees, health care. I've been here since 1973, and I've never seen a Congress that's done half of what this one did. ...

I feel that this is not the time to make progress. Do we have to make progress? Absolutely. ... We can't keep pushing this thing off into the future.

What's the most important piece of legislation your colleagues need to deal with in the near future?
Oh, they have to deal with this retirement issue.

But is it really happening? People were talking about 10,000 federal workers packing up and leaving, and it hasn't happened.
No. The thing that's amazing to me is people don't look at a lot of these issues in context. ... This is not a time if I'm a federal worker I'm going to retire. My 401(k) probably took a big hit. My investments hit a rock. ... That's all gone. The fact that 10,000 people who we forecasted to retire didn't retire is almost a "duh." Who's going to go out and retire right now?

What we have is what's known as a pent up demand to retire. So at some point, instead of 10,000 retiring in one year, you'll have 40,000 retire in six months. That's what will happen, trust me, if this economy comes back and gets well and people have options. I'm not talking about options and taking a new job, I'm talking about just retiring. And they'll probably still have to have a second job, because the federal pension isn't going to cover it.

Is the government equipped to fill 40,000 jobs in six months?
No, no! And not the 40,000 jobs we're going to lose. This is my favorite subject, STEM: Science, technology, engineering and math. Think of the number of engineers and scientists that are getting ready to retire from the federal government with nobody to one to take their place in the private sector or the public sector. And this is going to be a gravy train, because there are so many scientists and engineers out of work who with some retraining can come back and do it. But when we use up those folks, where are we going to find the people to do it?

So what does the government need to do?
The President of the United States needs to say we're going to set up a conference on federal employees and what do we need to do to maintain federal employees. You're going to need to get some of the best minds in the country get together and plot out how this is going to work. you've got to start thinking about telework and getting all the technology, how can we increase the productivity of the federal employee? Who are the departments that need it?

You've got to make it -- in a world where there are so many things going on -- you have to make it a high priority.

You've been here for almost 24 years as a Senate chief of staff and senator. As cliché as it sounds, what's the biggest change you've seen?
The biggest change in the Senate as an institution is that freshmen senators were neither seen nor heard. It's dramatic.

And everything revolved around your committee. You had much fewer committee assignments. Everybody still had plenty to do. It's one of my pet peeves. I went from being on two committees for 14 months to four and I never came to work and never had enough to do.

We spend an hour every week just trying to figure out what we're going to do with committee meetings. Just the meetings, not the substance.

One of your former colleagues here, Pete Rouse, is now White House Chief of Staff. Any thoughts on his ascension?
Pete's a pro. There's a whole group of former chiefs of staff who are by and large a pretty qualified group of people by any measure. Pete was not, like me, just a one-trick pony who worked for one senator, he worked for several. Pete's the kind of guy who can do just about anything.

Has the role of Senate chief of staff changed since you first arrived?
When I was coming up, the biggest difference was that a lot of the southern Senators had a chief of staff who came with you, they stayed, 25, 35 years. Clearly there's a bigger turnover now in chiefs of staff.

It's like being married. It's chemistry. You've got to have a chief of staff that you just really enjoy being around. Somebody who you can talk about things that you can't talk to anybody else about, except your spouse. That's the way this job is. There has to be chemistry to make it work.

Have you seen Christine O'Donnell's new TV ad? Can she win?
No, I haven't seen it.

She says she has a lot of money and she's going up on TV. If she has the money she says she has, that's a big buy in Delaware. Do I think Chris Coons is going to win? Absolutely. I think Chris will win and be a great senator.

Will you be here to hand over the keys to whoever wins regardless?
Oh yeah, the Senate is the Senate. When the people of Delaware speak, that's it.

(Note: This interview has been edited for length.)

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below

By Ed O'Keefe  | October 6, 2010; 12:40 PM ET
Categories:  Congress, Workplace Issues  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: NTSB: Transportation fatalities fall
Next: Gulf oil spill response ill-managed, presidential panel says

Comments

When the Feds go then all the haterz will get their wish! So basically the Federal government is going to downsize in the forseeable future.

Posted by: ronjaboy | October 6, 2010 2:23 PM | Report abuse

The "experts" have been predicting the retirment wave for over a decade...hasn't happened yet and the government has spent 100s of millions of dollars to prepare. They could predict when folks under the old retirement plans were going to retire (using years of service, age, averages, etc.). With the new retirement system, there is no magic formula...age and years of service don't matter...it's whether or not the fed can afford to retire. One-Third basic retirement (which is on average, 1% for every year of service) isn't enough to survive on...another third (Social Security) is always on the table so folks don't know if they can depend on the estimated payment. Then, the final third, the 401K (the fund that runs out eventually - after retirment - unlike the old retirement plan that kept on going until death). The "experts" can continue to predict the brain drain - and when it does it will be individual rather than en mass - so the impact will be nominal. Eventually there will be a bunch of feds still working until their 70s (on average) or a ton of feds on well-fare.

Posted by: Metropolized | October 7, 2010 8:43 AM | Report abuse

OPM Will Continue RetireEZ Progress Without Hewitt
Significant Progress Made on Other Elements

Washington, D.C., October 16, 2008 - The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) today announced it will continue to progress with the RetireEZ program without the assistance of Hewitt Associates of Lincolnshire, Illinois. The 10-year, $290 million contract was cancelled due to Hewitt's failure to deliver a functioning retirement calculation engine in support of RetireEZ. The termination takes effect immediately. No work under the contract had been performed since OPM issued a stop-work order in May 2008. Additional elements of the overall RetireEZ program, including the process improvement element and data conversion, are unaffected by this action and progress continues to be made in both areas. The OPM POC is Contact: Peter Graves 202-606-2402


To the best of my knowledge, there is no replacement for RetireEZ. OPM and DOD Civilian Personnel in the field continue to process retirement packages manually. The backlog continues to grow on a diurnal basis. Within the DOD, the problem is exacerbated because of the transition from the National Security Personnel System (NSPS) in May 2010. Many employees in the Civil Service Retirement System are now "capped out at their high-three" and will no longer receive the full COLA each January. Therefore, I predict that many DOD employees will probably retire in the next 12-18 months because their COLA's are capped at 50%, instead of the 100% COLA. Additionally, these potential retirees will be experiencing a OPM and DOD Civilian Personnel workforce that is overwhelmed with the "manual" retirement processes of OPM because of their lack of an automated retirement process.

Posted by: charlespetron | October 7, 2010 10:46 AM | Report abuse

My Agency's hired plenty of new scientists and engineers, and they come with great skill sets. We'd hire many more if more people retired. The brain drain is a myth.

Yes, you can always find someone viewed as almost irreplaceable but that's often due to poor succession planning and development.

Posted by: TCarrollo | October 7, 2010 5:32 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company