Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:20 PM ET, 01/25/2011

Postal union ready for 'new direction'

By Ed O'Keefe

One of the nation's largest postal unions wants it members to do less griping and do more to make sure the U.S. Postal Service secures the changes it needs to stay afloat.

Cliff Guffey, president of the American Postal Workers Union, said his group needs to stop "acting as a grievance machine" and instead focus on lobbying Congress to enact changes to how the Postal Service pays workers and retirees.

USPS currently pays about $5 billion annually to prefund the cost of future retiree health benefits, a unique cost that postal officials and union leaders believe is an unfair financial burden on an already cash-strapped agency.

"When unions, mailers, and postal management try to rectify this misguided policy, some politicians erroneously characterize it as a 'bailout,'" Guffey wrote in a recent letter to union members.

APWU, which represents about 220,000 active and retired postal workers, and the Postal Service are negotiating a new multi-year contract for postal clerks, custodians, drivers, mechanics and administrative staffers. Guffey's letter does not signal that the union is ceding ground in the negotiations, spokeswoman Sally Davidow said Tuesday.

"We're not moving away from filing grievances, but we want to get our leaders more involved in the political process," Davidow said. "Our people need to be out there talking to politicians about these changes."

In addition to changing how USPS funds future retiree benefits, Postmaster General Patrick R. Donahoe is pushing for greater flexibility in setting delivery routes and schedules and closing unprofitable post offices -- a potential savings tactic prohibited by federal law. APWU and other unions generally oppose his proposals, believing Congress could rectify the Postal Service's perilous financial condition by allowing it to fund future health-care benefits as workers retire.

In an interview late last week, Donahoe said he appreciates that union leaders understand the need to change how USPS pays retirees.

"They are looking at the challenges that we have with the same 'Oh my goodness' that everybody else does," Donahoe said. "We've reduced headcount by 225,000 people since the year 2000. There are very few labor unions in the world that wouldn't be jumping up and down ranting and raving about that."

"They know what we're facing from a financial perspective," he added. "They know what's going on. They know what we've got on the table with them, and they have to make some decisions."

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below

By Ed O'Keefe  | January 25, 2011; 1:20 PM ET
Categories:  Postal Service, Workplace Issues  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Jobless rate dips in D.C., steady in Md., Va.
Next: Federal agencies running up big utility bills (Video)

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company