Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:15 AM ET, 02/10/2011

Fight for gays in the military isn't ending anytime soon

By Ed O'Keefe

Eye Opener

Plans to end the enforcement of "don't ask, don't tell" are moving along with the goal of ending the ban on gays in the military this year, but the debate sparked by last year's repeal of the policy won't end once President Obama and Pentagon leaders officially end it.

Gay rights activists who pushed lawmakers to end the policy now want Obama to sign an executive order extending non-discriminatory protections to gay and lesbian troops and they're pushing the Pentagon to extend further benefits to their same-sex partners. They also hope Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates will remove any mention of homosexuality from the discharge papers of troops who violated the ban, because of the potentially negative impact on future employment opportunities.

Gay leaders acknowledge they face several more years of work to ensure that gay men and lesbians in uniform eventually earn the same rights and protections afforded to other troops and civilian federal employees.

White House aides would not say this week if Obama plans to sign any memo or executive order extending non-discriminatory protections to gay and lesbian troops. Similar documents exist to protect gay federal workers. Aides instead pointed to a new Pentagon policy set to take effect once the ban is lifted that states all troops are "entitled to an environment free from personal, social, or institutional barriers" preventing promotion, and that "harassment or abuse based on sexual orientation is unacceptable."

"The release of the policy guidance is an important step toward implementing repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell,'" White House spokesman Shin Inouye said. "As the president said in his State of the Union Address, DADT will be fully repealed this year."

But the lack of a presidential order means gay troops would have fewer legal protections than their civilian colleagues, according to Richard Socarides, a former gay rights adviser to Bill Clinton and director of Equality Matters.

"If you work at the Agriculture Department as a clerk, you have better protections than somebody in the military," Socarides said in an interview. "They ought to be the same."

"This last final step is not a small matter," he added. "It's crucial that gay military personnel have legally enforceable protections which are lasting over time and no matter who is president and no matter who is in charge of the Pentagon."

Beyond non-discriminatory protections, there are also concerns about pay and benefits for gay troops. The federal Defense of Marriage Act bars the government from extending full health-care and housing benefits to the same-sex partners of gay troops, but Obama has ordered federal agencies to find fringe benefits they can provide to gay couples. Some are now providing relocation benefits or access to day care center and gyms, and gay workers can now take leave to care for severely ill partners.

Pentagon officials plan to conduct a similar review, but they should move quickly, according to Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.

"We've moved beyond someone being fired for their sexual orientation, but we're bumping up against the reality that they'll receive different pay and benefits because of their sexual orientation," he said.

Perhaps the most challenging effort is a push to erase any mention of "don't ask, don't tell" from the records of the 13,000 troops discharged for violating the ban. Mentions of homosexual conduct on discharge papers often required for review by potential employers has a potentially stigmatizing impact, according to Sarvis.

"Many will want to see that removed from their records," he said, because they often have to reveal their sexual orientation to future employers -- a potentially game-changing admission in certain parts of the country. SLDN, which provides legal services to troops impacted by the gay ban, has heard from hundreds of gay troops who want the Pentagon to remove references to DADT from their records. The group wants Gates to establish special boards to quickly review the discharges.

The Pentagon is reviewing SLDN's proposal, but any current or former service member may already petition service discharge review boards to reconsider their case, according to spokeswoman Eileen Lainez. They will still be able to do so once the policy ends, she said.

"This is going to be a continual process over years of kind of changing the mentality," said Fred Sainz, vice president of the Human Rights Campaign, another group that pushed for repeal. "I think that as frustrating as it is for many, we got as good as we were going to get, and people who are realistic about these things understand that. Over the course of the next few years, we'll work on this cycle of continuous improvement."

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below

Cabinet and Staff News: First Lady Michelle Obama wore a $34.95 H&M dress on the Today Show. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says terrorist threat may be at most "heightened state." Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke grilled at House hearing on inflation threats. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson earned an equally testy reception from lawmakers. White House re-nominates religious freedom ambassador. Ambassador Susan Rice warns the GOP against U.N. funding cuts.

CIA shakeup a bad idea, some old spies say: Veterans say a report that the agency is radically reorganizing its spy service is probably overblown, and if it's not, it's an idea that should be shot down.

Marine Corps leader calls for frugality: Gen. James Amos sent a signal of cooperation during a review of the force's equipment and budget ordered by the Pentagon.

Pentagon will back defense mergers outside top five companies: "We are actually quite welcome to that because we expect industry to make adjustments," in response to a slowdown in U.S. defense spending, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition said Wednesday.

War widows dispute tax on benefits: Time after time, members of Congress have promised to help the 55,000 affected widows, but laws have only created a more complicated system that's left many confused and angry.

GOP leaders propose $74 billion in cuts to Obama's budget request: The list also includes deep cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency, the federal home heating assistance program and federal block grants that aid cities facing budget woes.

OPM explains lower annuity checks: The expiration of the Make Work Pay tax credit and a consolidation of tax withholding tables impacted the amount of taxes withheld from benefits checks.

Federal workers campaign against proposed cuts: Fresh from its annual conference on Capitol Hill, the government's largest union is launching a $1 million-plus campaign across the country to fight looming cuts to the workforce.

As lawmakers look at E-Verify, businesses fear expansion of immigration program: Many business owners believe that House Republicans want to make E-Verify, currently a voluntary program for companies, mandatory.

Postal Service had $329 million loss in first quarter: The mail agency lost $329 million in the first quarter of its fiscal year -- Oct. 1 to Dec. 31 -- up from $297 million during the same period the year before.

SBA chief signals 2012 budget will eliminate some programs: But it is not clear which programs are on the chopping block

State Department launches Arabic Twitter feed: Foggy Bottom is using @USAbilAraby, which in English means "USA in Arabic." The feed's description says it's the "Department of State Arabic Media Hub."

'Inexcusable' delay on TSA body-scanner safety reports: The agency has yet to release radiation inspection reports for its X-ray equipment two months after lawmakers called for them to be made public.

Follow The Federal Eye on Twitter | Submit your news tips here

By Ed O'Keefe  | February 10, 2011; 7:15 AM ET
Categories:  Eye Opener  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: State Department launches Arabic Twitter feed
Next: TSA boss says he'd fire security officers who strike


i think our liberal democrats have opened a can of worms they will never be able to close.

Posted by: SISSD1 | February 10, 2011 8:32 AM | Report abuse

Great story. FYI - - the Gay military network, is providing a supportive environment for friending, sharing and networking between Gay active duty military, vets and supporters.

Posted by: skoa | February 10, 2011 8:55 AM | Report abuse

This won't be over until we pay people to be gay.

Posted by: Benson | February 10, 2011 5:16 PM | Report abuse

It will be OVER around September. 60 days from the Certification that will occur in July.

Posted by: thomasAlex | February 10, 2011 7:14 PM | Report abuse


"i think our liberal democrats have opened a can of worms they will never be able to close."

75% of the Country was for Repeal of DADT. So your saying 75% of the Country our liberal Democrats? WOW, I had no clue!

Posted by: thomasAlex | February 10, 2011 7:17 PM | Report abuse


75% of the Country was for Repeal of DADT. So your saying 75% of the Country our liberal Democrats? WOW, I had no clue!"


99% of the US citizens have never served in the Armed Forces and have no Idea what the hell they are talking about when they say that letting queers serve openly will have no affect on the effectiveness of efficiency of out Military. I served for 22 years (and in two wars) and speak from experience -- if it does come about it will mark the end of the US as a Military World Power.

Posted by: augustinephasemail | February 12, 2011 12:07 AM | Report abuse

I would like to see the valid statistical sample used by the government to extrapolate that 75% of the country supports repeal of DADT. Liberal promises to repeal DADT and pass comprehensive immigration reform (amnesty) are both potentially very damaging actions from which this country will never recover. On the one hand, gays serving openly in the military is an absolute non-starter. Gays have always served in the military. They did during my Vietnam Era service, and they did so quietly and without fanfare or bringing unwanted attention to themselves, for the most part. Those discovered were discharged and rightfully so!

Posted by: Ranger01 | February 12, 2011 9:36 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company