Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Share Stories  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |  Get Gridlock:    Twitter |    Facebook  |     RSS   |  phone Alerts

Legislators Push Purple Line

Rally.jpg
Porcari and regional leaders rally support for transit project. (Thomson)

Seems like there's no point in the history of a transit project that can't be described as pivotal or crucial or crisis. This is such a [fill in the blank] time for Maryland's Purple Line transitway.

Civic and political leaders, led by state Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari, met at the Langley Park Crossroads at noon today to rally support for the line and announce formation of a state legislative caucus to advance the cause.

Despite opposition centered in communities that would be most affected by the footprint of the light rail track or busway, the Purple Line does have an impressive array of local backers from one end of its route to the other.

It will need them. It's been just days since the project issued its draft environmental impact statement (see Post story) and next month, there will be four public hearings to discuss which, if any, construction option the state should choose. There's a billion bucks or so riding on the result -- and so is the course of development across the inner suburbs of Washington.

Overlaying that discussion is the one about the state of our economy and how best to spend government revenues that are almost certain to shrink over the next couple of years. I've heard from readers who question whether Maryland should continue spending to build the inner county connector -- a tremendous draw on transportation resources -- when we could spread that money around to other projects. Others question whether the Purple Line will itself suck up too much money.

Porcari urges citizens and government to think big about the transportation system and the Purple Line in particular. He says we need both the connector road and the transitway. Plus, he notes, the choice about connector road isn't really a choice anymore since so many of the contracts have been let and construction is so far advanced. (You've got to see the work from the air to get the right perspective, he said.)

The draft environmental impact statement lays out a set of alternatives ranging from doing nothing to building a lower-cost bus system to building a high-end light rail line. Porcari wouldn't name a favorite, but he said that whatever the state decides to do, it should not be done with short term economics as the driving factor.

Our region's growth may slow for a year or two, but longterm, it's heading toward immense and dense. Choices we make in the next few months about a transitway will expand or limit the region's potential over many decades.

By Robert Thomson  |  October 23, 2008; 2:27 PM ET
Categories:  Transportation Politics  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Commuter Page: Minding Your Metro Manners
Next: Walking Map of Silver Spring

Comments

Porcari should concentrate on how to keep existing services operating (namely commuter buses lines and certain MARC trains slated to be terminated) before spending my money we obviously don't have on services that don't exist yet.

Posted by: zizzy | October 23, 2008 3:33 PM | Report abuse

There couldn't be a better time to be building the Purple Line. In a time of high gas prices, headache-inducing traffic, endless sprawl, climate change and a recession -- a mass transit project will clearly alleviate many (if not all) of these problems.

Please sign a petition in favor of the Purple Line at http://www.purplelinenow.com

Posted by: PurpleLineNOW | October 23, 2008 4:45 PM | Report abuse

I'm a transit planner living in California. I have to say that the intriguing aspect of the Purple Line is that allows connections across the other lines without have to go all the way to downtown DC. Nearly all US transit systems are downtown oriented and hence do not reflect the way travel is conducted these days in metro areas. Ever since the late 60s, downtowns are just another destination. I wish you success in your bold venture. This is the beginning of a true transit network, one that offers lateral as well as downtown-centered transport. I am sure that you are considering transit developments at each of the major stations. Good luck!

Posted by: sunnsea | October 24, 2008 12:52 AM | Report abuse

The Purple Line will be one of the all-time biggest boondoggles in Maryland history. Frosh and these fruitcakes are tying to shoe-horn in a system that can never be expanded to go west from Bethesda. This is being built for developers along the route between Bethesda and New Carrolton. If this is such a great idea have the developers pay for it.

To keep pushing this white elephant at this troubling financial time is a joke.

Posted by: jdub1 | October 24, 2008 2:18 PM | Report abuse

Biggest waste ever.

Build heavy rail from Grovesnor to Forest Glen.

Posted by: AngryLiberal | October 27, 2008 3:20 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company