Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Share Stories  |  Traffic  |  Columns  |  Q&A     |  Get Gridlock:    Twitter |    Facebook  |     RSS   |  phone Alerts

Metro Board Wants More Options

When you look at the list of potential service cuts that the Metro staff unveiled this morning, think of what you're not seeing: There's no proposal to shut down the rail system early end bus service along a particular corridor -- none of the very drastic possibilities that have been the subject of speculation.

Instead, the staff presented ideas for widespread, but relatively low-impact reductions, at least compared with some of the speculation. If you're a transit user, that's no reason to let your guard down. When you look at the full list, you may see it as death by a thousand cuts, and some of the individual cuts are still pretty painful.

Metro board members, assembled for a work session on the budget problem this morning, asked the transit authority staff to come back with more for them to work with, after a first look at the service cut possibilities the staff just presented. (See the list in previous entry.)

No decisions about cuts were made today.

The board members are reluctant to approve any service cuts, but know they must have a list of possibilities soon, so they can take that plan to public hearings across the region. The staff says that service cuts would have to take effect by the end of June for the savings to have the full effect on the fiscal 2010 budget, which takes effect July 1.

They raised many questions about the list. Among them: They don't like the term "duplicate service" in a category covering potential cuts in bus service across the region. Board member Chris Zimmerman said that if you have a crowded train underground and a crowded bus above,you don't have duplicate service.

They also want to know in more detail about the impact of cuts, and the resulting savings, on their jurisdictions.

Board member Jim Graham of the District wants to know about more options, such as how much money Metro could raise by increasing parking fees on weekends. He noted that The Post ran a list of potential budget adjustments on its Commuter page on Sunday and asked for public comment. He said he wished that we had included more options for people to consider.

Board member Chris Zimmerman of Arlington said his trip to the Metro headquarters in downtown Washington included a ride on the Columbia Heights-Pentagon City bus line. He called it the most heavily used route in the Commonwealth of Virginia. And he noted the 16G, H and W buses on that line are on the list for reduced service during peak periods.

Metro, he said, needs to look at the overall impact of its suggested cuts.

"This is exactly how public transit declined in America for half a century," he said. As transit agencies gave their riders less, they rode less.


By Robert Thomson  |  February 19, 2009; 11:27 AM ET
Categories:  Metro  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Share Thoughts on Possible Metro Service Cuts
Next: Weekend Track Work to Cause Delays

Comments

Why not start out by eliminating useless programs, such as the radio advertising? Just yesterday, I heard an ad for Metro on the radio which gave no useful information and served no purpose other than to promote Metro ridership.

I think it's safe to say that everyone who lives here knows that Metro exists. The radio ads serve no purpose other than to give the impression that Metro has wads of cash to throw around.

Same with the WMATA Youtube videos. What does making random Youtube videos have to do with Metro's goal of moving people through the city?

Cutting the publicity budget may just be a drop in the bucket, but it would demonstrate that WMATA is serious about putting the needs of the customer over their own pet projects.

Posted by: stuckman | February 19, 2009 12:26 PM | Report abuse

Have they said if the Orange Line delays will be resolved by the afternoon rush hour?

Posted by: sweetorestes | February 19, 2009 1:02 PM | Report abuse

A Full Bottom up review of All Cost, Identify Drivers and Cost Centers and Associated Benefits. Publish cost of operations and administration on the web and increase transparency.

A Full Management review of all Cost and Benefits before proposing alternatives.

Review Revenue Streams, I constantly see citizens going through the attendant gates without paying fares on the metro even when an attendant is present.

Posted by: RbrtDonelson | February 19, 2009 2:15 PM | Report abuse

How about opening the Metro underground right-of-way to local cell phone repeaters (for a "consideration" of course) as a way to generate additional revenue.

Posted by: WPReaderID | February 20, 2009 5:46 AM | Report abuse

WPReader: Metro already does this. Haven't you noticed? Verizon and Sprint users can use their cell phones underground.

Posted by: stuckman | February 20, 2009 1:14 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company