Say It Ain't So

Government Executive has done some follow-up legwork on the sad revelations of misdeeds at the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

What they found only reinforced the findings of a Government Accountability Office report last month, which was spurred by whistleblowers calling a hotline.

Reporters Robert Brodsky and Elizabeth Newell interviewed former DCAA employees, who told them that agency supervisors made audits more favorable to contractors. Here's an excerpt of their story.

"They described an environment where supervisors got upset when auditors used the wrong font in their reports or made spelling errors, but appeared unconcerned that serious overbilling mistakes may have slipped through the cracks. And they recalled times when incomplete audits were pushed out the door by managers more concerned with meeting internal quotas and timetables than by the quality of their work."

"'They don't want findings. It makes waves and draws attention so they avoid those types of things so the higher ups don't come down on them,' said one former auditor who spent nearly three years at DCAA's Minneapolis branch. 'The goal is not to save taxpayers money. People are really too afraid about what they will have to do to back up their findings so they try to avoid them altogether.'"

What a sad state of affairs. More money than ever is being spent on contracts, and we have an insufficient workforce that's not even allowed to do its best on behalf of, well, us.

An excerpt from the GAO findings:

"GAO substantiated the allegations. Although DCAA policy states that its audits are performed according to GAGAS, GAO found numerous examples where DCAA failed to comply with GAGAS. For example, contractor officials and the DOD contracting community improperly influenced the audit scope, conclusions, and opinions of three audits--a serious independence issue. At two DCAA locations, GAO found evidence that (1) working papers did not support reported opinions, (2) DCAA supervisors dropped findings and changed audit opinions without adequate evidence for their changes, and
(3) sufficient audit work was not performed to support audit opinions and conclusions. GAO also substantiated allegations of inadequate supervision of certain audits at a third DCAA location."

The GAO report said "DCAA did not agree with the 'totality' of GAO's findings, but it did acknowledge shortcomings with some audits and agreed to take corrective action."

By Robert O'Harrow |  August 11, 2008; 6:28 AM ET
Previous: Missile Earmarks | Next: Walk Around Money

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Someone in Washington, someone who actually can think independently should change DCAA's process from perfroming audits - to performing "price analysis"...and then we can give GAGAS back to the Comptroller.

Posted by: Man A. Geer | August 12, 2008 7:42 AM

I tink it's spelled get all you can before they close the door.
I would wonder who in Washington is able to think for themselves when Mr bush and mr chenney don't seem to allow people on thier staffs to think for them selves, it's not in thier job title.
SecondThis taxpayer would sing praises to heaven if just one HONEST audit of the over spending in Iraq, and where the money is really going. It really shouldn't be to hard to find out if one could get past the gag orders that seem to protect those who contract with or to the major corporations that run the show ( like Haliburton)LOL.
But what the heck, after November we just might see some positive changes in all this mess.

Posted by: Franklin Seeeley | August 14, 2008 1:50 AM

I think the real shame is that the DCAA management thinks that they are doing their jobs by moving out older, more experienced auditors. For some reason this seems to be their priority, rather than supporting auditors who are working hard to identify mis-spending! Internal politicing, the old buddy system and general nepotism seem to be the modus operandi as the same people in the agency seem to be the ones who get promoted, and recognized - regardless of the work they perform. Just the good old boy mentality run amok.

Posted by: Pappasan | August 14, 2008 10:23 PM

Franklin Seeeley (three e's):

The only change we will see in November is a closer view of the NWO regardless of the joke that is called an election. I call it as part of the cake and circuses that the public are given, while we march on till WWIII and then the one world goverment.

Posted by: charles r curbo | August 21, 2008 11:55 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company