Kennedy Circulating Health Reform Plan
By Ceci Connolly
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) is circulating the outlines of sweeping health-care legislation that would require every American to have insurance and would insist that employers contribute to workers’ coverage.
The summary document, provided by two Democrats who do not work for Kennedy, closely resembles a reform law enacted in Kennedy's home state three years ago and would place requirements on individuals to purchase health insurance and mandate that virtually all employers contribute to the cost of an employee's care, according to a summary document distributed to members of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.
The Kennedy plan, which does not detail how Congress might pay for universal coverage, also includes an ambitious expansion of the federal-state Medicaid program and creates a Federal Health Board modeled after the Federal Reserve Board.
Kennedy spokesman Anthony Coley said Thursday evening that "we are still actively negotiating with members of the committee" and that "there is no final policy." He refused to elaborate on the bill summary being passed around on Capitol Hill.
Kennedy staff also has circulated a schedule that calls for Democrats on the committee to discuss the bill on Tuesday and Wednesday of next week and a bipartisan committee meeting on Friday. The timetable envisions markup of the bill beginning June 16.
Though he has not been seen in public in weeks, Kennedy appears to be reasserting his authority over the legislative effort to revamp the nation's troubled health system.
In an article published in today's Boston Globe, the chairman of the Senate Health Committee pointedly refers to "our legislation," a notable shift from other generic references to the overall push in Congress. In the piece, Kennedy forcefully advocates creation of a government-sponsored health program that would compete with the existing private market.
A top adviser to the ailing lawmaker predicted Kennedy's health bill will be the first released when Congress returns, putting added pressure on Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) to speed up work on his panel.
By
Paul Volpe
|
May 28, 2009; 5:20 PM ET
Categories:
Daily Dose
Save & Share:
Previous: At the Movies: 'Money-Driven Medicine'
Next: Outlook Section: Focus on Health Reform
Posted by: Paladin7b | May 28, 2009 8:59 PM | Report abuse
Maybe the Kennedy's would like to pay for this fiasco. Just talk to anyone from Mass. It is a disaster and a cruel hoax for residents of the state!
Posted by: Jimbo77 | May 28, 2009 9:54 PM | Report abuse
actually Paladin, reports of unsustainable costs have been greatly exaggerated. FYI… New Study: Massachusetts Plan Shows Signs of Success The early returns on Massachusetts's health-care-for-all program indicated it was an unsustainable budget buster. But a new analysis of the cost at the three-year mark challenges that conclusion. (MA Taxpayer Foundation) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/healthcare_mass_doc.pdf
Posted by: skiplaxin | May 29, 2009 11:36 AM | Report abuse
If you would like to help pressure Congress to pass single payer health care please join our voting bloc at: http://www.votingbloc.org/Health_Bloc.php
Posted by: letsgobuffalo | May 29, 2009 12:33 PM | Report abuse
What a complete joke this is. And Tom D. the Senator from SD has his pawprints all over this.
Posted by: dweyenbe | May 29, 2009 2:39 PM | Report abuse
Healthcare Reform The insurance industry has geared up to influence health care reform. They will bombard Congress with political contributions and lobbyists. The media will enjoy a huge increase in ad revenues. I would like to suggest another approach. What if President Obama by Executive Order made Medicare payment schedules user friendly public information. HCFA can publish CPT schedules in a format that patients and doctors can readily understand and utilize. The President can ask medical providers to agree to accept Medicare pricing for the service provided, if the patient will pay the doctor directly at time of service with a medical credit card issued by either hospitals, banks or insurance carriers. One advantage is that all medical bills (hospitals, doctors, drugs and medical equipment) would be tracked on one database. Most importantly, doctors would no longer have the enormous back office costs of filing a claims form with various insurance companies on different forms and waiting months to get paid. Their financial savings would be enormous. Patients would soon be able to decide if 1st dollar insurance policies are really cost effective. They may well switch to high deductible catastrophic policies, which is really what insurance is supposed to protect against. Patients with verifiable low incomes can have the government pay their credit card bills on a sliding scale based on their income. This could eliminate Medicaid. The implications of this simple change are enormous and it can be done with little cost to government. Medicare pays doctors far less than insurance companies pay and far far below what an individual without insurance is billed. Doctors today, when they see a patient, do not even know when or how much they will be paid. All they know is that they have been forced to combine into group practices because of the enormous financial cost of filing claims and fighting with insurance companies over billings and procedure approvals. This is such a simple solution. Doctors know their patients, put them back in charge of their patient’s well being.
Posted by: swenk | May 30, 2009 2:35 PM | Report abuse
If you are uninsured and does not have insurance, you should check out the website http://UninsuredAmerica.blogspot.com - John Mayer, California
Posted by: johnmayer76 | June 1, 2009 6:20 AM | Report abuse
Obama during the primaries strongly criticized Hillary's plan, requiring people to purchase health care insurance, if they lacked coverage. The subsidies in Massachusetts are quite limited, especially for those in the middle class. President Obama is likely to abandon his previous opposition to an individual mandate, if so he will show he is just a typical politician, saying one thing to be elected, then doing the opppsite when elected.
--------
Posted by: Aprogressiveindependent | June 2, 2009 4:06 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.












You mean the Massachusetts Health plan whose cost has gone up over 85% above projections, includes multiple mandatory coverage items which push up the costs of insurance to twice the average of the other 49 states, which Massachusetts Governor Patrick has described as having "unsustainable costs", and which is attempting to control costs by slashing doctor reimbursements, causing some doctors to refuse to pick up new patients?