Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:00 AM ET, 12/ 7/2010

Lonnie Bunch: Was the election of Abraham Lincoln a threat to the South?

By Lonnie Bunch

Founding director of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Bunch

In many ways, the election of Abraham Lincoln was both a real and perceived threat to the South. It was a perceived threat because in the minds of most Southerners, Lincoln was viewed as an abolitionist who was bent on destroying slavery. They felt that because Lincoln had received almost all of his votes from the North, his presidential administration would allow the North to impose its will on the South. The fear was that Lincoln would use the power of the federal government to either destroy slavery or contain it. If he contained it by not letting it expand into the territories, Southerners believed that slavery would die. It had to either grow or die.

The reality is that Lincoln really struggled to keep the Union together. If he could preserve the union without ending slavery then that is what he would do. The decision to end slavery slowly evolved during the actual conflict. The irony is that by leaving the Union the South forced Lincoln to be more aggressive against slavery than he would have been if they had stayed in the Union. By the time of Lincoln’s election, the political and cultural differences had hardened into an atmosphere where compromise was as rare as a Republican in the antebellum south.

Could Lincoln have kept the Union together? Probably not. Lincoln’s election was the spark that ignited a long simmering conflict that would eventually be settled by war.


By Lonnie Bunch  | December 7, 2010; 9:00 AM ET
Categories:  Views  | Tags:  Lonnie Bunch  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Gary Gallagher: Was the election of Abraham Lincoln a threat to the South?
Next: Harold Holzer: Was the election of Abraham Lincoln a threat to the South?

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company