Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 9:38 AM ET, 01/31/2011

Frank Williams: Why did the Peace Conference fail in its mission?

By Frank Williams

Chairman of The Lincoln Forum

Waugh

The Peace Conference was doomed to fail from the beginning for several reasons. First, not all states sent delegates - only 21 with seven states meeting in Montgomery about the same time to establish the Confederate States of America.; second, only some of the delegates took their charge seriously - as many were sent (Northern and Southern) intent on insuring there would be no compromise; third, even the Northern delegations were divided among themselves with conservatives led by Senator William H. Seward seeking accommodation or delay to save the border states for the Union and Senator Salmon P. Chase who did not wish to relinquish any ground secured by the Republican Party victory - thus there could be no extension of slavery any where, but no interference where it existed.

The absence of 13 states was too great a handicap; there was only a thin moral majority and the conflicts between the radicals of North and South was too great to overcome.

All that was to come from the Convention was support for a new Constitutional amendment forever protecting slavery in the states and the District of Columbia from Congressional interference. Republicans and Abraham Lincoln who were willing to accept this as the party platform had disclaimed any right of interference and the President-elect repeatedly stated he had no objection to it. This would become the proposed Thirteenth Amendment sent to the states in 1861.


By Frank Williams  | January 31, 2011; 9:38 AM ET
Categories:  Views  | Tags:  Frank Williams  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Harold Holzer: Why did the Peace Conference in Washington fail in its mission?
Next: John Marszalek: Why did the Peace Conference in Washington fail in its mission?

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company