Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 6:47 PM ET, 02/23/2011

Great drama at Virginia secession convention

By Linda Wheeler

A book with a rather ordinary, academic title—“Showdown in Virginia: The 1861 Convention and the Fate of the Union”—turns out to be a great read. Historians William W. Freehling and Craig M. Simpson researched the four volumes of official convention records from the 1861 meeting as well as newspaper stories to create a 200-page account of the two-month battle between the unionists and secessionists. There is magnificent oratory, fiery debates, intrigue, a near duel and the abrupt walkout by delegates from the northwestern counties.

The authors have brought life to what is usually seen as just one more state voting to secede from the Union. The process was torturous with a mid-convention vote favoring the unionists, 88-45. In the end, it was reversed. The vote to secede was 88-55.

The switch was not brought on by the Confederates firing on Ft. Sumter, as is generally believed, but rather by President Lincoln’s call on April 15, 1861 for 75,000 volunteer troops to protect the capital and put down the rebellion. Even then, there was a continuing interest at the convention in finding a peaceful resolution to the crisis but on May 23, a huge majority of Virginians voted to affirm the ordinance of secession.

Freehling and Simpson also delve into the still debated issue of why Virginians, and Southerners in general, who did not own slaves were willing to fight a war to maintain slavery. Many had lived as neighbors to slave owners and had not objected to the “peculiar institution” but when they saw the federal government as coercing them, in effect making white men slaves without their consent, that action could be tolerated.

During the convention, there were several curious twists on the long road to a decision. On the day that Ft. Sumter surrendered, it was Jubal Early, later to become an army general fighting for the Confederacy, who spoke out for the unionists. He was appalled that Virginians would celebrate the outbreak of violence in South Carolina when it involved his former comrade, Major Robert Anderson, who was defending "a handful of starving men" and had been compelled, "at the cannon's mouth, to lower the flag of his country." His words almost led to a duel with secessionist delegate Thomas F. Goode.

The paperback edition, published in 2010, is available for about $23 from the University of Virginia Press as well as other online sources.


By Linda Wheeler  | February 23, 2011; 6:47 PM ET
Categories:  News  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Brag Bowling: Why did South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas choose to secede?
Next: Tweeting the Civil War: Assassination conspiracy against Lincoln is discovered

Comments

Earlier the assembly missed ending slavery in Virginia by one vote. When we honor the confederate soldier forget the strategic causes and remember that they fought invasion and many like Early and Lee wanted the union but went with the state.

Posted by: wardenerd | February 24, 2011 9:45 AM | Report abuse

More fascinating reading about Virginia's decision to secede is available on the Library of Virginia's Web site, "Union or Secession: Virginians Decide," at http://www.virginiamemory.com/online_classroom/union_or_secession/

Drawn primarily from the collections of the Library of Virginia, "Union or Secession" presents private letters, public debates, and other records that allow Virginians who experienced the sectional crisis between the autumn of 1860 and the summer of 1861 to explain their thoughts, fears, and decisions in their own words. "Union or Secession" also contains the life stories of forty Virginians who experienced slavery, the sectional tensions of the 1850s, the secession crisis, and the split of their state into two.

Posted by: GeoWPC | February 24, 2011 3:53 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company